TY - JOUR
T1 - Researching up and across in physical education and sport pedagogy
T2 - Methodological lessons learned from an intergenerational narrative inquiry
AU - Rynne, Steven
AU - Enright, Eimear
AU - Alfrey, Laura Georgina
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Of issue in this paper are the ways in which different forms of narrative may be of value inundertaking research in potentially thorny situations. The project that inspired this paper saw 30Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy (PESP) Early Career Academics (ECAs) from more than20 universities across Australasia, North America and Europe, provide narrative accounts of theirongoing academic experiences. From these stories, three letters seeking advice and guidance fromleaders in the field were constructed. Following further feedback from the ECAs, the 3 letterswere sent to 11 professors in the PESP field with a request to respond, also in letter form. Thecomposite letters and the professorial responses were then the subject of a symposium at aninternational PESP conference. While the larger project engages with questions of being andbecoming an academic in the neoliberal university, this paper is primarily concerned withmethodological issues, including our steps and missteps with narrative, inquiry and the field.More specifically, the focus is on narrative as both the method and phenomena of study. As such,we consider issues associated with using dialogue as data, the provocation of participants, as wellas both the presentation and representation of data and the relative power of the participants. Indoing so, we critically engage with issues of anonymity (or lack thereof), the practice of‘researching up’ and finally reach the conclusion that the careful approach to data generation,treatment and presentation necessitated by this project, should be a more regular feature of allqualitative inquiry
AB - Of issue in this paper are the ways in which different forms of narrative may be of value inundertaking research in potentially thorny situations. The project that inspired this paper saw 30Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy (PESP) Early Career Academics (ECAs) from more than20 universities across Australasia, North America and Europe, provide narrative accounts of theirongoing academic experiences. From these stories, three letters seeking advice and guidance fromleaders in the field were constructed. Following further feedback from the ECAs, the 3 letterswere sent to 11 professors in the PESP field with a request to respond, also in letter form. Thecomposite letters and the professorial responses were then the subject of a symposium at aninternational PESP conference. While the larger project engages with questions of being andbecoming an academic in the neoliberal university, this paper is primarily concerned withmethodological issues, including our steps and missteps with narrative, inquiry and the field.More specifically, the focus is on narrative as both the method and phenomena of study. As such,we consider issues associated with using dialogue as data, the provocation of participants, as wellas both the presentation and representation of data and the relative power of the participants. Indoing so, we critically engage with issues of anonymity (or lack thereof), the practice of‘researching up’ and finally reach the conclusion that the careful approach to data generation,treatment and presentation necessitated by this project, should be a more regular feature of allqualitative inquiry
KW - Narrative research
KW - researching up
KW - research methodology
KW - sport pedagogy
KW - universities
KW - academic career
KW - early career researchers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006285099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13573322.2016.1253554
DO - 10.1080/13573322.2016.1253554
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85006285099
SN - 1357-3322
VL - 22
SP - 140
EP - 156
JO - Sport, Education and Society
JF - Sport, Education and Society
IS - 1
ER -