Researcher Safety? Ethnography in the Interdisciplinary World of Audit Cultures

Jennie Morgan, Sarah Pink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Anthropologists intermittently reflect on the danger and risk that ethnography can involve. Here, we advance this question in a contemporary research environment where the regulatory logics of occupational safety and health (OSH) encroach increasingly on anthropological practice through institutional research governance. We draw on our research into workplace OSH in the construction, health care, and logistics sectors—a research field dominated by behavioral theories that support the preventative logics of OSH regulation. Taking an autoethnographic approach, we explore how researching in potentially dangerous environments requires ethnographers to learn how to be safe through others’ situated safety logics and through those of researcher safety. It is, we argue, through these engagements with the improvisatory ways that workers generally, and researchers specifically, engage with safety, that another set of inconsistencies between OSH preventative logics and our anthropological understanding of how ethnographic knowing emerges become visible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)400-409
Number of pages10
JournalCultural Studies - Critical Methodologies
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • anthropology
  • audit cultures
  • autoethnography
  • improvisation
  • reflexivity
  • regulation
  • researcher safety

Cite this