TY - JOUR
T1 - Research on adults with autism spectrum disorder: Roundtable report
AU - Gray, Kylie Megan
AU - Howlin, Patricia A
AU - Arciuli, Joanne
AU - Glozier, Nick
AU - Guastella, Adam
AU - Horstead, Sian Keira
AU - Rice, Lauren
AU - Stancliffe, Roger James
AU - Einfeld, Stewart Lloyd
AU - Clarke, Kristina S
AU - Falkmer, Torbjorn
AU - Begeer, Sander
AU - Brock, Jon
AU - Costley, Debra
AU - Di Rita, Peter
AU - West, Sarah
AU - Yam, Christine
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The range of outcomes for young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) and the early childhood factors associated with this diversity have implications for clinicians and scientists. Methods This prospective study provided a unique opportunity to predict outcome 17 years later for a relatively large sample of children diagnosed with ASD at 2 years old. Diagnostic and psychometric instruments were administered between 2 and 19 with data from 2, 3, and 19 included in this study. Clinicians administered tests without knowledge of previous assessments whenever possible. Caregivers provided additional information through questionnaires. Results: Significant intellectual disabilities at 19 were predicted by age 2 about 85 of the time from VIQ and NVIQ scores together, though prediction of young adult outcome for youths with average or higher intelligence was more complex. By 19, 9 of participants had largely overcome core difficulties associated with ASD and no longer retained a diagnosis. These youths with Very Positive Outcomes were more likely to have participated in treatment and had a greater reduction in repetitive behaviors between age 2 and 3 compared to other Cognitively Able youths (VIQ =70) with ASD. Very Positive Outcome youths did not differ phenotypically from Cognitively Able ASD individuals at 2 but both groups differed from Cognitively Less Able individuals (VIQ
AB - The range of outcomes for young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) and the early childhood factors associated with this diversity have implications for clinicians and scientists. Methods This prospective study provided a unique opportunity to predict outcome 17 years later for a relatively large sample of children diagnosed with ASD at 2 years old. Diagnostic and psychometric instruments were administered between 2 and 19 with data from 2, 3, and 19 included in this study. Clinicians administered tests without knowledge of previous assessments whenever possible. Caregivers provided additional information through questionnaires. Results: Significant intellectual disabilities at 19 were predicted by age 2 about 85 of the time from VIQ and NVIQ scores together, though prediction of young adult outcome for youths with average or higher intelligence was more complex. By 19, 9 of participants had largely overcome core difficulties associated with ASD and no longer retained a diagnosis. These youths with Very Positive Outcomes were more likely to have participated in treatment and had a greater reduction in repetitive behaviors between age 2 and 3 compared to other Cognitively Able youths (VIQ =70) with ASD. Very Positive Outcome youths did not differ phenotypically from Cognitively Able ASD individuals at 2 but both groups differed from Cognitively Less Able individuals (VIQ
UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/13668250.2015.1064343
M3 - Article
SN - 1366-8250
VL - 40
SP - 388
EP - 393
JO - Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
JF - Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
IS - 4
ER -