Abstract
The aims of the Global Research Council (GRC) to improve international scientific collaboration (Nature 485, 427; 2012) have been enthusiastically endorsed by John Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Subra Suresh, head of the US National Science Foundation (see go.nature.com/rbiykb). We disagree with their statement that ?good science anywhere in the world is good for science ? and good for people ? everywhere in the world?.
The agreed GRC standards for merit-based peer review will improve research quality through collaborations between high- and middle-income countries, which have strong research systems. But the guidelines are unlikely to boost science capacity in low-income countries.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 191 - 191 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Nature |
| Volume | 486 |
| Issue number | Art. No. 7402 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver