Research Commentary: Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research

Izak Benbasat, Ron Weber

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Three types of diversity have been prominent in the Information Systems discipline for over a decade: (a) diversity in the problems addressed; (b) diversity in the theoretical foundations and reference disciplines used to account for IS phenomena; and (c) diversity in the methods used to collect, analyze, and interpret data. History has played a major part in encouraging IS researchers to use diversity as a means of countering criticisms of their discipline and increasing their research rigor and productivity. In particular, frequent recourse to reference disciplines has underpinned much of the research that has been undertaken since the early 1980s. There are now signs, however, that the level of diversity that currently exists in IS research may be problematic. In this paper, we consider some of the benefits and costs of allowing diversity to reign in the IS discipline. We also propose a structure that we hope will facilitate discourse on the benefits and costs of diversity and on the role that diversity should now play in the IS discipline.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-399
Number of pages11
JournalInformation Systems Research
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1996

Keywords

  • Diversity
  • Ethics
  • History
  • IS Research
  • Paradigms
  • Reference Disciplines

Cite this

@article{276e9f04e2264ca2ae05c012dd01e869,
title = "Research Commentary: Rethinking {"}Diversity{"} in Information Systems Research",
abstract = "Three types of diversity have been prominent in the Information Systems discipline for over a decade: (a) diversity in the problems addressed; (b) diversity in the theoretical foundations and reference disciplines used to account for IS phenomena; and (c) diversity in the methods used to collect, analyze, and interpret data. History has played a major part in encouraging IS researchers to use diversity as a means of countering criticisms of their discipline and increasing their research rigor and productivity. In particular, frequent recourse to reference disciplines has underpinned much of the research that has been undertaken since the early 1980s. There are now signs, however, that the level of diversity that currently exists in IS research may be problematic. In this paper, we consider some of the benefits and costs of allowing diversity to reign in the IS discipline. We also propose a structure that we hope will facilitate discourse on the benefits and costs of diversity and on the role that diversity should now play in the IS discipline.",
keywords = "Diversity, Ethics, History, IS Research, Paradigms, Reference Disciplines",
author = "Izak Benbasat and Ron Weber",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/isre.7.4.389",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "389--399",
journal = "Information Systems Research",
issn = "1047-7047",
publisher = "INFORMS",
number = "4",

}

Research Commentary : Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research. / Benbasat, Izak; Weber, Ron.

In: Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, 01.01.1996, p. 389-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research Commentary

T2 - Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research

AU - Benbasat, Izak

AU - Weber, Ron

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Three types of diversity have been prominent in the Information Systems discipline for over a decade: (a) diversity in the problems addressed; (b) diversity in the theoretical foundations and reference disciplines used to account for IS phenomena; and (c) diversity in the methods used to collect, analyze, and interpret data. History has played a major part in encouraging IS researchers to use diversity as a means of countering criticisms of their discipline and increasing their research rigor and productivity. In particular, frequent recourse to reference disciplines has underpinned much of the research that has been undertaken since the early 1980s. There are now signs, however, that the level of diversity that currently exists in IS research may be problematic. In this paper, we consider some of the benefits and costs of allowing diversity to reign in the IS discipline. We also propose a structure that we hope will facilitate discourse on the benefits and costs of diversity and on the role that diversity should now play in the IS discipline.

AB - Three types of diversity have been prominent in the Information Systems discipline for over a decade: (a) diversity in the problems addressed; (b) diversity in the theoretical foundations and reference disciplines used to account for IS phenomena; and (c) diversity in the methods used to collect, analyze, and interpret data. History has played a major part in encouraging IS researchers to use diversity as a means of countering criticisms of their discipline and increasing their research rigor and productivity. In particular, frequent recourse to reference disciplines has underpinned much of the research that has been undertaken since the early 1980s. There are now signs, however, that the level of diversity that currently exists in IS research may be problematic. In this paper, we consider some of the benefits and costs of allowing diversity to reign in the IS discipline. We also propose a structure that we hope will facilitate discourse on the benefits and costs of diversity and on the role that diversity should now play in the IS discipline.

KW - Diversity

KW - Ethics

KW - History

KW - IS Research

KW - Paradigms

KW - Reference Disciplines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347933880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/isre.7.4.389

DO - 10.1287/isre.7.4.389

M3 - Review Article

VL - 7

SP - 389

EP - 399

JO - Information Systems Research

JF - Information Systems Research

SN - 1047-7047

IS - 4

ER -