TY - JOUR
T1 - Requesting HIV Results Be Conveyed in-Person
T2 - Perspectives of Clinicians and People Recently Diagnosed with HIV
AU - Wells, Nathanael
AU - Murphy, Dean
AU - Ellard, Jeanne
AU - Howard, Chris
AU - Keen, Phillip
AU - Fairley, Christopher
AU - Donovan, Basil
AU - Prestage, Garrett
AU - on behalf of the RISE Study Team
N1 - Funding Information:
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. The RISE Study receives funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australia, Gilead Sciences, and the health departments of the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, the North Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Western Australia, and Victoria.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Introduction: Guidelines recommend that, where possible, clinicians convey HIV-positive test results in person in Australia. However, HIV-negative and all other STI results are routinely delivered by phone or text message. Requesting individuals to obtain positive HIV test results in person could be a deviation from the standard delivery of healthcare and be interpreted as indicating a positive HIV diagnosis. Methods: This paper is based on two related, ongoing qualitative studies conducted in Australia with HIV healthcare providers and people recently diagnosed with HIV. In study one, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with people who had recently received a positive HIV diagnosis. In study two, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with HIV healthcare and peer support providers. Interviews were analyzed thematically. Results: While clinicians were willing to convey HIV-positive diagnoses by phone, most preferred in-person delivery. In-person delivery enabled clinicians to assess visual cues to better respond to the psychological and emotional needs of patients. For some participants living with HIV, however, the requirement to return to the clinic was interpreted as an unofficial HIV-positive diagnosis. This led to a period in which recently diagnosed participants believed they were HIV-positive without having received an explicit diagnosis. Conclusion: Protocols for delivering HIV diagnoses by phone, followed by a face-to-face appointment, may reduce the period of anxiety for some patients and assist with an early connection to HIV care and support. Policy Implications: In some instances, conveying HIV diagnoses by phone may be more appropriate than recalling individuals to the clinic to deliver a positive HIV diagnosis in person.
AB - Introduction: Guidelines recommend that, where possible, clinicians convey HIV-positive test results in person in Australia. However, HIV-negative and all other STI results are routinely delivered by phone or text message. Requesting individuals to obtain positive HIV test results in person could be a deviation from the standard delivery of healthcare and be interpreted as indicating a positive HIV diagnosis. Methods: This paper is based on two related, ongoing qualitative studies conducted in Australia with HIV healthcare providers and people recently diagnosed with HIV. In study one, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with people who had recently received a positive HIV diagnosis. In study two, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with HIV healthcare and peer support providers. Interviews were analyzed thematically. Results: While clinicians were willing to convey HIV-positive diagnoses by phone, most preferred in-person delivery. In-person delivery enabled clinicians to assess visual cues to better respond to the psychological and emotional needs of patients. For some participants living with HIV, however, the requirement to return to the clinic was interpreted as an unofficial HIV-positive diagnosis. This led to a period in which recently diagnosed participants believed they were HIV-positive without having received an explicit diagnosis. Conclusion: Protocols for delivering HIV diagnoses by phone, followed by a face-to-face appointment, may reduce the period of anxiety for some patients and assist with an early connection to HIV care and support. Policy Implications: In some instances, conveying HIV diagnoses by phone may be more appropriate than recalling individuals to the clinic to deliver a positive HIV diagnosis in person.
KW - HIV diagnoses
KW - HIV management
KW - People living with HIV
KW - Phone diagnosis
KW - PLHIV
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85161388063
U2 - 10.1007/s13178-023-00827-x
DO - 10.1007/s13178-023-00827-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 37363348
AN - SCOPUS:85161388063
SN - 1868-9884
VL - 21
SP - 364
EP - 371
JO - Sexuality Research and Social Policy
JF - Sexuality Research and Social Policy
IS - 1
M1 - SH23118
ER -