TY - JOUR
T1 - Reproducibility of the six-minute walk test and Glittre ADL-test in patients hospitalized for acute and exacerbated chronic lung disease
AU - José, Anderson
AU - Dal Corso, Simone
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2015/7/14
Y1 - 2015/7/14
N2 - Background: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and the Glittre ADL-test (GT) are used to assess functional capacity and exercise tolerance; however, the reproducibility of these tests needs further study in patients with acute lung diseases. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of the 6MWT and GT performed in patients hospitalized for acute and exacerbated chronic lung diseases. Method: 48 h after hospitalization, 81 patients (50 males, age: 52±18 years, FEV1: 58±20% of the predicted value) performed two 6MWTs and two GTs in random order on different days. Results: There was no difference between the first and second 6MWT (median 349 m [284–419] and 363 m [288–432], respectively) (ICC: 0.97; P<0.0001). A difference between the first and second tests was found in GT (median 286 s [220–378] and 244 s [197–323] respectively; P<0.001) (ICC: 0.91; P<0.0001). Conclusion: Although both the 6MWT and GT were reproducible, the best results occurred in the second test, demonstrating a learning effect. These results indicate that at least two tests are necessary to obtain reliable assessments.
AB - Background: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and the Glittre ADL-test (GT) are used to assess functional capacity and exercise tolerance; however, the reproducibility of these tests needs further study in patients with acute lung diseases. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of the 6MWT and GT performed in patients hospitalized for acute and exacerbated chronic lung diseases. Method: 48 h after hospitalization, 81 patients (50 males, age: 52±18 years, FEV1: 58±20% of the predicted value) performed two 6MWTs and two GTs in random order on different days. Results: There was no difference between the first and second 6MWT (median 349 m [284–419] and 363 m [288–432], respectively) (ICC: 0.97; P<0.0001). A difference between the first and second tests was found in GT (median 286 s [220–378] and 244 s [197–323] respectively; P<0.001) (ICC: 0.91; P<0.0001). Conclusion: Although both the 6MWT and GT were reproducible, the best results occurred in the second test, demonstrating a learning effect. These results indicate that at least two tests are necessary to obtain reliable assessments.
KW - Exercise test
KW - Exercise tolerance
KW - Lung diseases
KW - Physical therapy
KW - Reproducibility of results
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936943092&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0092
DO - 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0092
M3 - Article
C2 - 26039036
AN - SCOPUS:84936943092
SN - 1413-3555
VL - 19
SP - 235
EP - 242
JO - Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
JF - Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
IS - 3
ER -