TY - JOUR
T1 - Renal effects of infusion of rilmenidine and guanabenz in conscious dogs
T2 - contribution of peripheral and central nervous system α2–adrenoceptors
AU - Evans, Roger G.
AU - Anderson, Warwick P.
PY - 1995
Y1 - 1995
N2 - We tested the renal effects of the α2‐adrenoceptor agonists, rilmenidine and guanabenz and the antagonists, 2‐methoxyidazoxan and idazoxan, in conscious dogs. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that putative imidazoline (I) receptors influence renal function. We reasoned that since rilmenidine and guanabenz are selective for I1‐ and I2‐binding sites respectively, an influence of one of these receptive sites on renal function would be reflected in qualitative differences between the effects of these agents. Moreover, effects mediated by putative I‐receptors should be relatively resistant to antagonism by the selective α2‐adrenoceptor antagonist, 2‐methoxyidazoxan. Since the effects of these drugs on renal function could be mediated in the central nervous system or periphery, the dogs were studied under both normal and ganglion‐blocked conditions. In dogs with intact autonomic reflexes, 2‐methoxyidazoxan (15 μg kg−1 plus 0.6 μg kg−1 min−1) produced effects consistent with a generalized increase in sympathetic drive, including increases in mean arterial pressure and plasma renin activity, and a reduction in sodium excretion. In ganglion‐blocked dogs, 2‐methoxyidazoxan reduced sodium excretion but had no discernible effect on systemic or renal haemodynamics. We conclude that an α2‐adrenoceptor‐mediated mechanism in the central nervous system tonically inhibits sympathetic drive in the conscious dog. In ganglion‐blocked dogs idazoxan (3‐300 μg kg−1) dose‐dependently increased arterial pressure. This was not abolished by concomitant administration of 2‐methoxyidazoxan (0.3‐30 μg kg−1). The pressor effect of idazoxan is therefore probably mediated by an agonist action at α‐adrenoceptors. The effects of infusions of rilmenidine (0.1‐1.0 mg kg−1) and guanabenz (10‐100 μg kg−1) were indistinguishable. They comprised dose‐dependent increases in mean arterial pressure, urine excretion, and glomerular filtration rate (the latter in ganglion blocked dogs only), and dose‐dependent reductions in heart rate, renal blood flow and sodium excretion (only in dogs with intact autonomic reflexes). All of these effects were antagonized by 2‐methoxyidazoxan. We conclude that the renal effects of rilmenidine and guanabenz infusions in conscious dogs are predominantly, if not completely, attributable to activation of α2‐adrenoceptors. Our results do not support the hypothesis that putative I‐receptors contribute towards the renal effects of these agents. 1995 British Pharmacological Society
AB - We tested the renal effects of the α2‐adrenoceptor agonists, rilmenidine and guanabenz and the antagonists, 2‐methoxyidazoxan and idazoxan, in conscious dogs. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that putative imidazoline (I) receptors influence renal function. We reasoned that since rilmenidine and guanabenz are selective for I1‐ and I2‐binding sites respectively, an influence of one of these receptive sites on renal function would be reflected in qualitative differences between the effects of these agents. Moreover, effects mediated by putative I‐receptors should be relatively resistant to antagonism by the selective α2‐adrenoceptor antagonist, 2‐methoxyidazoxan. Since the effects of these drugs on renal function could be mediated in the central nervous system or periphery, the dogs were studied under both normal and ganglion‐blocked conditions. In dogs with intact autonomic reflexes, 2‐methoxyidazoxan (15 μg kg−1 plus 0.6 μg kg−1 min−1) produced effects consistent with a generalized increase in sympathetic drive, including increases in mean arterial pressure and plasma renin activity, and a reduction in sodium excretion. In ganglion‐blocked dogs, 2‐methoxyidazoxan reduced sodium excretion but had no discernible effect on systemic or renal haemodynamics. We conclude that an α2‐adrenoceptor‐mediated mechanism in the central nervous system tonically inhibits sympathetic drive in the conscious dog. In ganglion‐blocked dogs idazoxan (3‐300 μg kg−1) dose‐dependently increased arterial pressure. This was not abolished by concomitant administration of 2‐methoxyidazoxan (0.3‐30 μg kg−1). The pressor effect of idazoxan is therefore probably mediated by an agonist action at α‐adrenoceptors. The effects of infusions of rilmenidine (0.1‐1.0 mg kg−1) and guanabenz (10‐100 μg kg−1) were indistinguishable. They comprised dose‐dependent increases in mean arterial pressure, urine excretion, and glomerular filtration rate (the latter in ganglion blocked dogs only), and dose‐dependent reductions in heart rate, renal blood flow and sodium excretion (only in dogs with intact autonomic reflexes). All of these effects were antagonized by 2‐methoxyidazoxan. We conclude that the renal effects of rilmenidine and guanabenz infusions in conscious dogs are predominantly, if not completely, attributable to activation of α2‐adrenoceptors. Our results do not support the hypothesis that putative I‐receptors contribute towards the renal effects of these agents. 1995 British Pharmacological Society
KW - central nervous system
KW - conscious dog
KW - imidazoline receptor
KW - kidney
KW - renal blood flow
KW - sodium excretion
KW - α ‐Adrenoceptors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029083306&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16373.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16373.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 8564219
AN - SCOPUS:0029083306
SN - 0007-1188
VL - 116
SP - 1557
EP - 1570
JO - British Journal of Pharmacology
JF - British Journal of Pharmacology
IS - 1
ER -