Relationship of aortic excess pressure obtained using pressure-only reservoir pressure analysis to directly measured aortic flow in humans

Michael Michail, Om Narayan, Kim H. Parker, James D. Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: A reservoir pressure model describing left ventricular-large artery interaction has been proposed as a useful heuristic model providing insight into the propagation of the central blood pressure as well as providing clinical prognostic information. A pressure-only approach to calculation of reservoir pressure waves has been proposed but this assumes that the resultant excess pressure is proportional to the volume flow rate out of the left ventricle; this has not been tested in humans. Approach: We use non-invasively acquired central pressure and flow data obtained in the 2nd Australian National Blood Pressure Study to test this assumption and to investigate the use of flow approximations based on excess pressure or an assumed triangular flow pattern in calculation of forward and backwards waves in the aortic root. Main results: Results from 821 subjects showed close association between the shape of measured flow patterns and calculated excess pressure, with mean coefficient of determination R 2 = 0.931 0.046(SD). For directly measured versus triangular flow approximation R 2 was 0.918 0.057. Comparison of the peak amplitudes of forwards (Pf) and backwards (Pb) going pressure waves resulted in significant correlation between Pfmax and Pbmax using both measured flow and the triangular flow approximation (0.83 and 0.79 respectively) and using excess pressure as a flow approximation (Pfmax 0.86 and Pbmax 0.77). All associations for peak pressures and integrals were high with R-values between 0.70 and 0.95. Significance: Pressure-only reservoir wave analysis appears to conform to the inherent assumptions underpinning the mathematical approach employed: this provides support for use of reservoir analysis as a non-invasive method to describe potentially important features and functions of ventriculo-vascular interaction without the requirement for flow measurement.

Original languageEnglish
Article number064006
Number of pages8
JournalPhysiological Measurement
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jun 2018

Keywords

  • aortic blood pressure
  • central blood pressure
  • forward and backward pressure waves
  • reservoir pressure analysis

Cite this

@article{e3329242c8a64f4e8815ffced3035ab0,
title = "Relationship of aortic excess pressure obtained using pressure-only reservoir pressure analysis to directly measured aortic flow in humans",
abstract = "Objectives: A reservoir pressure model describing left ventricular-large artery interaction has been proposed as a useful heuristic model providing insight into the propagation of the central blood pressure as well as providing clinical prognostic information. A pressure-only approach to calculation of reservoir pressure waves has been proposed but this assumes that the resultant excess pressure is proportional to the volume flow rate out of the left ventricle; this has not been tested in humans. Approach: We use non-invasively acquired central pressure and flow data obtained in the 2nd Australian National Blood Pressure Study to test this assumption and to investigate the use of flow approximations based on excess pressure or an assumed triangular flow pattern in calculation of forward and backwards waves in the aortic root. Main results: Results from 821 subjects showed close association between the shape of measured flow patterns and calculated excess pressure, with mean coefficient of determination R 2 = 0.931 0.046(SD). For directly measured versus triangular flow approximation R 2 was 0.918 0.057. Comparison of the peak amplitudes of forwards (Pf) and backwards (Pb) going pressure waves resulted in significant correlation between Pfmax and Pbmax using both measured flow and the triangular flow approximation (0.83 and 0.79 respectively) and using excess pressure as a flow approximation (Pfmax 0.86 and Pbmax 0.77). All associations for peak pressures and integrals were high with R-values between 0.70 and 0.95. Significance: Pressure-only reservoir wave analysis appears to conform to the inherent assumptions underpinning the mathematical approach employed: this provides support for use of reservoir analysis as a non-invasive method to describe potentially important features and functions of ventriculo-vascular interaction without the requirement for flow measurement.",
keywords = "aortic blood pressure, central blood pressure, forward and backward pressure waves, reservoir pressure analysis",
author = "Michael Michail and Om Narayan and Parker, {Kim H.} and Cameron, {James D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1088/1361-6579/aaca87",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
journal = "Physiological Measurement",
issn = "0967-3334",
publisher = "IOP Publishing",
number = "6",

}

Relationship of aortic excess pressure obtained using pressure-only reservoir pressure analysis to directly measured aortic flow in humans. / Michail, Michael; Narayan, Om; Parker, Kim H.; Cameron, James D.

In: Physiological Measurement, Vol. 39, No. 6, 064006, 28.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship of aortic excess pressure obtained using pressure-only reservoir pressure analysis to directly measured aortic flow in humans

AU - Michail, Michael

AU - Narayan, Om

AU - Parker, Kim H.

AU - Cameron, James D.

PY - 2018/6/28

Y1 - 2018/6/28

N2 - Objectives: A reservoir pressure model describing left ventricular-large artery interaction has been proposed as a useful heuristic model providing insight into the propagation of the central blood pressure as well as providing clinical prognostic information. A pressure-only approach to calculation of reservoir pressure waves has been proposed but this assumes that the resultant excess pressure is proportional to the volume flow rate out of the left ventricle; this has not been tested in humans. Approach: We use non-invasively acquired central pressure and flow data obtained in the 2nd Australian National Blood Pressure Study to test this assumption and to investigate the use of flow approximations based on excess pressure or an assumed triangular flow pattern in calculation of forward and backwards waves in the aortic root. Main results: Results from 821 subjects showed close association between the shape of measured flow patterns and calculated excess pressure, with mean coefficient of determination R 2 = 0.931 0.046(SD). For directly measured versus triangular flow approximation R 2 was 0.918 0.057. Comparison of the peak amplitudes of forwards (Pf) and backwards (Pb) going pressure waves resulted in significant correlation between Pfmax and Pbmax using both measured flow and the triangular flow approximation (0.83 and 0.79 respectively) and using excess pressure as a flow approximation (Pfmax 0.86 and Pbmax 0.77). All associations for peak pressures and integrals were high with R-values between 0.70 and 0.95. Significance: Pressure-only reservoir wave analysis appears to conform to the inherent assumptions underpinning the mathematical approach employed: this provides support for use of reservoir analysis as a non-invasive method to describe potentially important features and functions of ventriculo-vascular interaction without the requirement for flow measurement.

AB - Objectives: A reservoir pressure model describing left ventricular-large artery interaction has been proposed as a useful heuristic model providing insight into the propagation of the central blood pressure as well as providing clinical prognostic information. A pressure-only approach to calculation of reservoir pressure waves has been proposed but this assumes that the resultant excess pressure is proportional to the volume flow rate out of the left ventricle; this has not been tested in humans. Approach: We use non-invasively acquired central pressure and flow data obtained in the 2nd Australian National Blood Pressure Study to test this assumption and to investigate the use of flow approximations based on excess pressure or an assumed triangular flow pattern in calculation of forward and backwards waves in the aortic root. Main results: Results from 821 subjects showed close association between the shape of measured flow patterns and calculated excess pressure, with mean coefficient of determination R 2 = 0.931 0.046(SD). For directly measured versus triangular flow approximation R 2 was 0.918 0.057. Comparison of the peak amplitudes of forwards (Pf) and backwards (Pb) going pressure waves resulted in significant correlation between Pfmax and Pbmax using both measured flow and the triangular flow approximation (0.83 and 0.79 respectively) and using excess pressure as a flow approximation (Pfmax 0.86 and Pbmax 0.77). All associations for peak pressures and integrals were high with R-values between 0.70 and 0.95. Significance: Pressure-only reservoir wave analysis appears to conform to the inherent assumptions underpinning the mathematical approach employed: this provides support for use of reservoir analysis as a non-invasive method to describe potentially important features and functions of ventriculo-vascular interaction without the requirement for flow measurement.

KW - aortic blood pressure

KW - central blood pressure

KW - forward and backward pressure waves

KW - reservoir pressure analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049785322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1361-6579/aaca87

DO - 10.1088/1361-6579/aaca87

M3 - Article

VL - 39

JO - Physiological Measurement

JF - Physiological Measurement

SN - 0967-3334

IS - 6

M1 - 064006

ER -