Relationship governance for very different partners

the corporation-nonprofit case

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Organizations increasingly form relationships with partners that have goals, values or operating cultures different to their own. These relationships have significant potential to generate innovative products or services and increase opportunities for service delivery. While they can provide greater access to resources, infrastructure or stakeholders, they can struggle with collaboration. Such partnerships may also encounter differences in the role of governance mechanisms such as trust and commitment. Only limited research however has addressed the governance implications of such relationships. We compared managers' perspectives on relationship governance mechanisms for 267 nonprofits and 276 corporations involved in corporate-nonprofit relationships. We found that ‘fit’ - compatibility and complementarity - was important to performance in such relationships. We found also however that nonprofits valued the role of trust in these relationships significantly more than corporations. Our findings suggest potential for significant success in these types of relationships but also possible complications from differences of opinion as to how they should be governed. While relationships between very different partners can succeed, they should remain cognizant of differences in each partner's expectations for relationship governance and its role in relationship performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-41
Number of pages11
JournalIndustrial Marketing Management
Volume63
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Keywords

  • Commitment
  • Corporate-nonprofit relationships
  • Crosssector
  • Relationship governance
  • Social alliances
  • Trust

Cite this

@article{296a7055dffe42ad91742b86053f4d83,
title = "Relationship governance for very different partners: the corporation-nonprofit case",
abstract = "Organizations increasingly form relationships with partners that have goals, values or operating cultures different to their own. These relationships have significant potential to generate innovative products or services and increase opportunities for service delivery. While they can provide greater access to resources, infrastructure or stakeholders, they can struggle with collaboration. Such partnerships may also encounter differences in the role of governance mechanisms such as trust and commitment. Only limited research however has addressed the governance implications of such relationships. We compared managers' perspectives on relationship governance mechanisms for 267 nonprofits and 276 corporations involved in corporate-nonprofit relationships. We found that ‘fit’ - compatibility and complementarity - was important to performance in such relationships. We found also however that nonprofits valued the role of trust in these relationships significantly more than corporations. Our findings suggest potential for significant success in these types of relationships but also possible complications from differences of opinion as to how they should be governed. While relationships between very different partners can succeed, they should remain cognizant of differences in each partner's expectations for relationship governance and its role in relationship performance.",
keywords = "Commitment, Corporate-nonprofit relationships, Crosssector, Relationship governance, Social alliances, Trust",
author = "Yelena Tsarenko and Simpson, {Dayna Frith}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.004",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "31--41",
journal = "Industrial Marketing Management",
issn = "0019-8501",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Relationship governance for very different partners : the corporation-nonprofit case. / Tsarenko, Yelena; Simpson, Dayna Frith.

In: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 63, 01.05.2017, p. 31-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship governance for very different partners

T2 - the corporation-nonprofit case

AU - Tsarenko, Yelena

AU - Simpson, Dayna Frith

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Organizations increasingly form relationships with partners that have goals, values or operating cultures different to their own. These relationships have significant potential to generate innovative products or services and increase opportunities for service delivery. While they can provide greater access to resources, infrastructure or stakeholders, they can struggle with collaboration. Such partnerships may also encounter differences in the role of governance mechanisms such as trust and commitment. Only limited research however has addressed the governance implications of such relationships. We compared managers' perspectives on relationship governance mechanisms for 267 nonprofits and 276 corporations involved in corporate-nonprofit relationships. We found that ‘fit’ - compatibility and complementarity - was important to performance in such relationships. We found also however that nonprofits valued the role of trust in these relationships significantly more than corporations. Our findings suggest potential for significant success in these types of relationships but also possible complications from differences of opinion as to how they should be governed. While relationships between very different partners can succeed, they should remain cognizant of differences in each partner's expectations for relationship governance and its role in relationship performance.

AB - Organizations increasingly form relationships with partners that have goals, values or operating cultures different to their own. These relationships have significant potential to generate innovative products or services and increase opportunities for service delivery. While they can provide greater access to resources, infrastructure or stakeholders, they can struggle with collaboration. Such partnerships may also encounter differences in the role of governance mechanisms such as trust and commitment. Only limited research however has addressed the governance implications of such relationships. We compared managers' perspectives on relationship governance mechanisms for 267 nonprofits and 276 corporations involved in corporate-nonprofit relationships. We found that ‘fit’ - compatibility and complementarity - was important to performance in such relationships. We found also however that nonprofits valued the role of trust in these relationships significantly more than corporations. Our findings suggest potential for significant success in these types of relationships but also possible complications from differences of opinion as to how they should be governed. While relationships between very different partners can succeed, they should remain cognizant of differences in each partner's expectations for relationship governance and its role in relationship performance.

KW - Commitment

KW - Corporate-nonprofit relationships

KW - Crosssector

KW - Relationship governance

KW - Social alliances

KW - Trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011616040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.004

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 31

EP - 41

JO - Industrial Marketing Management

JF - Industrial Marketing Management

SN - 0019-8501

ER -