TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship communication and the course of psychological outcomes among couples coping with localised prostate cancer
AU - Manne, Sharon L.
AU - Kashy, Deborah
AU - Myers-Virtue, Shannon
AU - Zaider, Talia
AU - Kissane, David W.
AU - Heckman, Carolyn J.
AU - Kim, Isaac
AU - Penedo, Frank
AU - Lee, David
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Objective: How couples communicate about cancer is an important predictor of psychological outcomes for men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer and their spouses. We examined the predictive role of disclosure, responsiveness, mutual avoidance, and holding back on depressive symptoms, psychological adjustment, cancer-specific distress, and cancer concerns. Methods: Eighty-one prostate cancer patients and their spouses completed measures of communication at baseline and measures of four psychological outcomes at baseline, five, 12, and 26 weeks after baseline. Dyadic growth models tested the effects of time and role on each outcome over time. Results: Higher disclosure and responsiveness predicted better psychological outcomes. Less mutual avoidance and holding back predicted poorer psychological outcomes. Across communication variables, individuals who engaged in poorer communication initially had poorer psychological outcomes that improved over time, whereas individuals who engaged in better communication initially maintained their more positive standing without change or changed in the positive direction. For all outcomes, those with better communication still had better psychological outcomes at six months. Conclusion: Couples’ cancer-specific relationship communication predicts their psychological outcomes. More research is needed to identify effective interventions, including a longer therapy course, individual communication training, or greater focus on addressing barriers to sharing and responsiveness.
AB - Objective: How couples communicate about cancer is an important predictor of psychological outcomes for men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer and their spouses. We examined the predictive role of disclosure, responsiveness, mutual avoidance, and holding back on depressive symptoms, psychological adjustment, cancer-specific distress, and cancer concerns. Methods: Eighty-one prostate cancer patients and their spouses completed measures of communication at baseline and measures of four psychological outcomes at baseline, five, 12, and 26 weeks after baseline. Dyadic growth models tested the effects of time and role on each outcome over time. Results: Higher disclosure and responsiveness predicted better psychological outcomes. Less mutual avoidance and holding back predicted poorer psychological outcomes. Across communication variables, individuals who engaged in poorer communication initially had poorer psychological outcomes that improved over time, whereas individuals who engaged in better communication initially maintained their more positive standing without change or changed in the positive direction. For all outcomes, those with better communication still had better psychological outcomes at six months. Conclusion: Couples’ cancer-specific relationship communication predicts their psychological outcomes. More research is needed to identify effective interventions, including a longer therapy course, individual communication training, or greater focus on addressing barriers to sharing and responsiveness.
KW - cancer
KW - marital relationship
KW - prostate cancer
KW - relationship communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101463705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ecc.13401
DO - 10.1111/ecc.13401
M3 - Article
C2 - 33586282
AN - SCOPUS:85101463705
SN - 0961-5423
VL - 30
JO - European Journal of Cancer Care
JF - European Journal of Cancer Care
IS - 4
M1 - e13401
ER -