Relationship between illness severity scores in acute kidney injury

Antoine Schneider, Miklos Lipcsey, Michael John Bailey, David V Pilcher, Rinaldo Bellomo

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOther

Abstract

Background: In the field of critical care nephrology, recent publications have used different illness severity scoring systems, making outcome comparisons difficult. Objective: To establish a methodology to translate one illness severity scoring system into another for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Design: Statistical analysis of prospectively obtained data. Methods: Using data from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database, we obtained Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, APACHE III and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) scores for all patients admitted with AKI. We applied correlation and linear regression analyses as well as crossvalidation with holdout samples. Results: Between 2001 and 2010, the three illness severity scores were obtained in 636 431 admissions. Of these, 37 203 fulfilled the APACHE score criteria for AKI. The coefficient of determination (R 2) between APACHE II and APACHE III scores was 0.66. The overall model was APACHE III = 3.13 ? APACHE II + 7.99 (P <0.001). Similarly, the R2 between APACHE III and the SAPS II scores was 0.78. The overall model was APACHE III = 1.49 ? SAPS II + 15.5 (P <0.001). The R2 between APACHE II and SAPS II scores was 0.62. The overall model was APACHE II = 0.35 ? SAPS II + 9.3 (P <0.001). Conclusions: Simple, robust translational formulae can be developed to allow clinicians to compare illness severity of patients with AKI when illness severity is expressed with different scoring systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53 - 55
Number of pages3
JournalCritical Care and Resuscitation
Volume14
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this

@article{8cc89fdfa2824eb2b6f6442515ffd550,
title = "Relationship between illness severity scores in acute kidney injury",
abstract = "Background: In the field of critical care nephrology, recent publications have used different illness severity scoring systems, making outcome comparisons difficult. Objective: To establish a methodology to translate one illness severity scoring system into another for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Design: Statistical analysis of prospectively obtained data. Methods: Using data from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database, we obtained Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, APACHE III and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) scores for all patients admitted with AKI. We applied correlation and linear regression analyses as well as crossvalidation with holdout samples. Results: Between 2001 and 2010, the three illness severity scores were obtained in 636 431 admissions. Of these, 37 203 fulfilled the APACHE score criteria for AKI. The coefficient of determination (R 2) between APACHE II and APACHE III scores was 0.66. The overall model was APACHE III = 3.13 ? APACHE II + 7.99 (P <0.001). Similarly, the R2 between APACHE III and the SAPS II scores was 0.78. The overall model was APACHE III = 1.49 ? SAPS II + 15.5 (P <0.001). The R2 between APACHE II and SAPS II scores was 0.62. The overall model was APACHE II = 0.35 ? SAPS II + 9.3 (P <0.001). Conclusions: Simple, robust translational formulae can be developed to allow clinicians to compare illness severity of patients with AKI when illness severity is expressed with different scoring systems.",
author = "Antoine Schneider and Miklos Lipcsey and Bailey, {Michael John} and Pilcher, {David V} and Rinaldo Bellomo",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "53 -- 55",
journal = "Critical Care and Resuscitation",
issn = "1441-2772",
publisher = "Australasian Medical Publishing Co. Pty Ltd. (AMPCo)",
number = "1-2",

}

Relationship between illness severity scores in acute kidney injury. / Schneider, Antoine; Lipcsey, Miklos; Bailey, Michael John; Pilcher, David V; Bellomo, Rinaldo.

In: Critical Care and Resuscitation, Vol. 14, No. 1-2, 2012, p. 53 - 55.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOther

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between illness severity scores in acute kidney injury

AU - Schneider, Antoine

AU - Lipcsey, Miklos

AU - Bailey, Michael John

AU - Pilcher, David V

AU - Bellomo, Rinaldo

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: In the field of critical care nephrology, recent publications have used different illness severity scoring systems, making outcome comparisons difficult. Objective: To establish a methodology to translate one illness severity scoring system into another for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Design: Statistical analysis of prospectively obtained data. Methods: Using data from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database, we obtained Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, APACHE III and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) scores for all patients admitted with AKI. We applied correlation and linear regression analyses as well as crossvalidation with holdout samples. Results: Between 2001 and 2010, the three illness severity scores were obtained in 636 431 admissions. Of these, 37 203 fulfilled the APACHE score criteria for AKI. The coefficient of determination (R 2) between APACHE II and APACHE III scores was 0.66. The overall model was APACHE III = 3.13 ? APACHE II + 7.99 (P <0.001). Similarly, the R2 between APACHE III and the SAPS II scores was 0.78. The overall model was APACHE III = 1.49 ? SAPS II + 15.5 (P <0.001). The R2 between APACHE II and SAPS II scores was 0.62. The overall model was APACHE II = 0.35 ? SAPS II + 9.3 (P <0.001). Conclusions: Simple, robust translational formulae can be developed to allow clinicians to compare illness severity of patients with AKI when illness severity is expressed with different scoring systems.

AB - Background: In the field of critical care nephrology, recent publications have used different illness severity scoring systems, making outcome comparisons difficult. Objective: To establish a methodology to translate one illness severity scoring system into another for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Design: Statistical analysis of prospectively obtained data. Methods: Using data from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database, we obtained Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, APACHE III and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) scores for all patients admitted with AKI. We applied correlation and linear regression analyses as well as crossvalidation with holdout samples. Results: Between 2001 and 2010, the three illness severity scores were obtained in 636 431 admissions. Of these, 37 203 fulfilled the APACHE score criteria for AKI. The coefficient of determination (R 2) between APACHE II and APACHE III scores was 0.66. The overall model was APACHE III = 3.13 ? APACHE II + 7.99 (P <0.001). Similarly, the R2 between APACHE III and the SAPS II scores was 0.78. The overall model was APACHE III = 1.49 ? SAPS II + 15.5 (P <0.001). The R2 between APACHE II and SAPS II scores was 0.62. The overall model was APACHE II = 0.35 ? SAPS II + 9.3 (P <0.001). Conclusions: Simple, robust translational formulae can be developed to allow clinicians to compare illness severity of patients with AKI when illness severity is expressed with different scoring systems.

UR - http://search.informit.com.au.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/fullText;dn=159841869657850;res=IELHEA

M3 - Letter

VL - 14

SP - 53

EP - 55

JO - Critical Care and Resuscitation

JF - Critical Care and Resuscitation

SN - 1441-2772

IS - 1-2

ER -