REITs, growth options and beta

Dogan Tirtiroglu, Thu Ha Nguyen, Ercan Tirtiroglu, Tan Cheng Wee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Are REITs income stocks, only? Following Myers (1977) and Bernardo et al. (2007), we examine empirically REITs’ unlevered betas, betas of growth options, betas of assets-in-place and the difference between the latter two in detail for 1983–2012, and also for three sequential, distinct, and mutually-exclusive REIT sub-periods. We find that, (i) the betas of growth options are larger than those of assets-in-place, (ii) there are differences in these betas across Equity REITs’ sub-sectors and sub-periods, (iii) REITs with a high growth profile tend to employ more short-term debt and are mainly listed on NASDAQ, and (iv) the Global Financial Crisis has influenced considerably the beta estimates across all sub-sectors and REIT types. These findings raise a question mark about the ‘income stock, only’ description of REITs. Our findings have important implications for the cost of capital of REITs and their capital budgeting practices. We discuss them, when appropriate, with numerical examples.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)370-394
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Assets-in-place
  • Beta
  • Cost of capital
  • Growth option
  • REIT Maturity Era
  • REITs

Cite this

Tirtiroglu, Dogan ; Nguyen, Thu Ha ; Tirtiroglu, Ercan ; Wee, Tan Cheng. / REITs, growth options and beta. In: Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. 2017 ; Vol. 55, No. 3. pp. 370-394.
@article{f4767068a9264c6faceafbf40964adc8,
title = "REITs, growth options and beta",
abstract = "Are REITs income stocks, only? Following Myers (1977) and Bernardo et al. (2007), we examine empirically REITs’ unlevered betas, betas of growth options, betas of assets-in-place and the difference between the latter two in detail for 1983–2012, and also for three sequential, distinct, and mutually-exclusive REIT sub-periods. We find that, (i) the betas of growth options are larger than those of assets-in-place, (ii) there are differences in these betas across Equity REITs’ sub-sectors and sub-periods, (iii) REITs with a high growth profile tend to employ more short-term debt and are mainly listed on NASDAQ, and (iv) the Global Financial Crisis has influenced considerably the beta estimates across all sub-sectors and REIT types. These findings raise a question mark about the ‘income stock, only’ description of REITs. Our findings have important implications for the cost of capital of REITs and their capital budgeting practices. We discuss them, when appropriate, with numerical examples.",
keywords = "Assets-in-place, Beta, Cost of capital, Growth option, REIT Maturity Era, REITs",
author = "Dogan Tirtiroglu and Nguyen, {Thu Ha} and Ercan Tirtiroglu and Wee, {Tan Cheng}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11146-016-9590-z",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "370--394",
journal = "Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics",
issn = "0895-5638",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

REITs, growth options and beta. / Tirtiroglu, Dogan; Nguyen, Thu Ha; Tirtiroglu, Ercan; Wee, Tan Cheng.

In: Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 55, No. 3, 10.2017, p. 370-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - REITs, growth options and beta

AU - Tirtiroglu, Dogan

AU - Nguyen, Thu Ha

AU - Tirtiroglu, Ercan

AU - Wee, Tan Cheng

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Are REITs income stocks, only? Following Myers (1977) and Bernardo et al. (2007), we examine empirically REITs’ unlevered betas, betas of growth options, betas of assets-in-place and the difference between the latter two in detail for 1983–2012, and also for three sequential, distinct, and mutually-exclusive REIT sub-periods. We find that, (i) the betas of growth options are larger than those of assets-in-place, (ii) there are differences in these betas across Equity REITs’ sub-sectors and sub-periods, (iii) REITs with a high growth profile tend to employ more short-term debt and are mainly listed on NASDAQ, and (iv) the Global Financial Crisis has influenced considerably the beta estimates across all sub-sectors and REIT types. These findings raise a question mark about the ‘income stock, only’ description of REITs. Our findings have important implications for the cost of capital of REITs and their capital budgeting practices. We discuss them, when appropriate, with numerical examples.

AB - Are REITs income stocks, only? Following Myers (1977) and Bernardo et al. (2007), we examine empirically REITs’ unlevered betas, betas of growth options, betas of assets-in-place and the difference between the latter two in detail for 1983–2012, and also for three sequential, distinct, and mutually-exclusive REIT sub-periods. We find that, (i) the betas of growth options are larger than those of assets-in-place, (ii) there are differences in these betas across Equity REITs’ sub-sectors and sub-periods, (iii) REITs with a high growth profile tend to employ more short-term debt and are mainly listed on NASDAQ, and (iv) the Global Financial Crisis has influenced considerably the beta estimates across all sub-sectors and REIT types. These findings raise a question mark about the ‘income stock, only’ description of REITs. Our findings have important implications for the cost of capital of REITs and their capital budgeting practices. We discuss them, when appropriate, with numerical examples.

KW - Assets-in-place

KW - Beta

KW - Cost of capital

KW - Growth option

KW - REIT Maturity Era

KW - REITs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994475772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11146-016-9590-z

DO - 10.1007/s11146-016-9590-z

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 370

EP - 394

JO - Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

JF - Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

SN - 0895-5638

IS - 3

ER -