Abstract
Regulation and governance in public management are vital for creating strong accountable institutions that can promote inclusive and sustainable growth. To realize twin goals of eradicating poverty and shared prosperity governments, businesses and civil society groups are working together to strengthen public management systems and improve the governance environment. Regulation and the significant issues raised by it have become central to the work of social scientists from many disciplines – political science, economics, law, sociology, psychology, anthropology, history and others (Braithwaite, 2007). The French economist Jean Tirole, has received 2014 Nobel prize arguing how and why governments should regulate powerful companies that dominate markets. He has clarified how to understand and regulate industries with a few powerful firms and explained how market regulations should be carefully adapted to the conditions of specific industries, rather than general regulations.
It is argued by researchers that unclear or questionable objectives, failure to properly target the regulation at the source of the ‘problem’, undue prescription and complexity, overlap, duplication or inconsistency with other regulation, especially across jurisdictions, excessive reporting or other paperwork requirements, poorly expressed, and confusing use of terms and unwarranted differentiation from international standards have not provided any theoretical platform for developing countries to design any framework. The contextual variation has been used by country authorities to avoid standardized compliance regime.
Within the domain of market-led economic development model, the main concern will be on continued development of regulatory structures appropriate to the socio-political environment in the aftermath of economic reform and structural change. Some researchers’ view of the market as a mechanism of regulation, at times, poses a challenge to conventional economics. In the presence of strong tendencies towards the growth of market monopoly, and the desire to capture the benefits of scale of economies, there is a need to investigate how this issue has been addressed in developing and emerging economies.
The paper examines corrupt and unethical practices among the telecommunication companies and ineffective regulatory governance by the regulator, the Bangladesh Telecommunications Regulatory Commission (BTRC). The purpose is to find out reasons for the dominance of informal institutions and the lack of adequate sanctions for illegal, unethical and corrupt practices by the mobile phone firms. The paper argues that poor enforcement of legal
provisions, weak institutions; inadequate corporate governance, and inadequate stakeholder pressure, are some of the reasons behind such practices.
It is argued by researchers that unclear or questionable objectives, failure to properly target the regulation at the source of the ‘problem’, undue prescription and complexity, overlap, duplication or inconsistency with other regulation, especially across jurisdictions, excessive reporting or other paperwork requirements, poorly expressed, and confusing use of terms and unwarranted differentiation from international standards have not provided any theoretical platform for developing countries to design any framework. The contextual variation has been used by country authorities to avoid standardized compliance regime.
Within the domain of market-led economic development model, the main concern will be on continued development of regulatory structures appropriate to the socio-political environment in the aftermath of economic reform and structural change. Some researchers’ view of the market as a mechanism of regulation, at times, poses a challenge to conventional economics. In the presence of strong tendencies towards the growth of market monopoly, and the desire to capture the benefits of scale of economies, there is a need to investigate how this issue has been addressed in developing and emerging economies.
The paper examines corrupt and unethical practices among the telecommunication companies and ineffective regulatory governance by the regulator, the Bangladesh Telecommunications Regulatory Commission (BTRC). The purpose is to find out reasons for the dominance of informal institutions and the lack of adequate sanctions for illegal, unethical and corrupt practices by the mobile phone firms. The paper argues that poor enforcement of legal
provisions, weak institutions; inadequate corporate governance, and inadequate stakeholder pressure, are some of the reasons behind such practices.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | International Research Society for Public Management Conference 2015 |
| Subtitle of host publication | Shaping the Future - Re-Invention or Revolution |
| Publisher | International Research Society for Public Management |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
| Event | Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management 2015: Shaping the Future: Re-Invention or Revolution? - University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom Duration: 30 Mar 2015 → 1 Apr 2015 Conference number: 19th http://irspm2015.com/index.php/irspm/IRSPM2015 |
Conference
| Conference | Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management 2015 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | IRSPM 2015 |
| Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
| City | Birmingham |
| Period | 30/03/15 → 1/04/15 |
| Internet address |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Regulatory Governance
- Ethics
- Bangladesh Telecommunications Regulatory Commission (BTRC)
- Corruption
- Institutions
- Regulatory Capture
- TADBIR( lobbying)
- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)
- mobile phone sector
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver