Regulating robo advice across the financial services industry

Tom Baker, Benedict Dellaert

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Automated financial product advisors-"robo advisors"-are emerging across the financial services industry, helping consumers choose investments, banking products, and insurance policies. Robo advisors have the potential to lower the cost and increase the quality and transparency of financial advice for consumers. But they also pose significant new challenges for regulators who are accustomed to assessing human intermediaries. A welldesigned robo advisor will be honest and competent, and it will recommend only suitable products. Because humans design and implement robo advisors, however, honesty, competence, and suitability cannot simply be assumed. Moreover, robo advisors pose new scale risks that are different in kind from the risks involved in assessing the conduct of thousands of individual actors. This Essay identifies the core components of robo advisors, key questions that regulators need to be able to answer about them, and the capacities that regulators need to develop in order to answer those questions. The benefits to developing these capacities almost certainly exceed the costs, because the same returns to scale that make an automated advisor so cost-effective lead to similar returns to scale in assessing the quality of automated advisors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)713-749
Number of pages37
JournalIowa Law Review
Volume103
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Cite this