Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Regional variation in mental healthcare utilization and suicide: evidence from movers in Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Poor mental health is a major global health issue, with many countries documenting high levels of unmet need and regional disparities in mental healthcare utilization. To determine how best to address these disparities, it is important to understand what drives regional variation. Using Census-linked microdata from Australia, we exploit cross-region migration to identify the extent to which patient and place factors drive regional variation in utilization of mental healthcare services and mental health prescriptions (antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics). We find that place factors account for approximately 72 % and 19 % of the regional variation in utilization of mental healthcare services and mental health prescriptions, respectively, with the rest reflecting patient-related demand. We also find suggestive evidence that larger place effects predict fewer mental health related Emergency Department presentations, self-harm hospitalizations, and suicides. Altogether, our findings suggest there is inadequate and inequitable supply in regions with low utilization, rather than inefficiently high utilization in high utilization regions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103029
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Health Economics
Volume102
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Healthcare demand
  • Healthcare spending
  • Healthcare supply
  • Mental health
  • Regional variation
  • Suicide

Cite this