TY - JOUR
T1 - Reflective practices in Open Dialogue meetings
T2 - Reporting and inferential ‘My side tellings’
AU - Schriver, Karen Nissen
AU - Buus, Niels
AU - Rossen, Camilla Blach
N1 - Funding Information:
We are very grateful for comments, supervision, and general good advice from Professor Jakob Steensig. He provided both insight and expertise that greatly assisted this research, as well as gave personal support in other parts of the process. The data session group at Aarhus University also were a valuable asset, because they helped us explore different perspectives on our excerpts. Ben Ong gave great advice on an earlier version of the paper. Last, we would like to greatly thank all of the participants who agreed to participate in this research, as well as the Open Dialogue therapists who made the study possible. The study was finacially supported by the Psychiatric Research Foundation in the Region of Southern Denmark.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - This paper reports a conversation analytic study of video-recorded, Open Dialogue psychotherapy sessions. Open Dialogue sessions are organized as network meetings between a client, members of the client's social network, and varying mental health professionals. In the analysis, we focus on a 10-min “reflection” taking place at the end of each network meeting, where two ‘reflecting’ therapists assess and comment on what was said in the first part of the meeting. First, we describe two types of ‘my side tellings’ found in the reflections. In ‘reporting my side tellings’, the ‘reflectants’ claim to report what they have heard the clients say during the meeting. In ‘inferring my side tellings’, the reflectants claim to present their own cognitive connotations and points of view. Second, we show how these two strategies may be related to ‘recognition’ and ‘interpretation’ as have been described in earlier research on psychotherapy. The empirical findings are discussed in relation to my side tellings in everyday conversation, and to the therapeutic context in particular. My side tellings can be viewed as strategies for expressing both caution and authority when it comes to representing the client's reality, and they may help represent the different ‘voices’ in the sessions.
AB - This paper reports a conversation analytic study of video-recorded, Open Dialogue psychotherapy sessions. Open Dialogue sessions are organized as network meetings between a client, members of the client's social network, and varying mental health professionals. In the analysis, we focus on a 10-min “reflection” taking place at the end of each network meeting, where two ‘reflecting’ therapists assess and comment on what was said in the first part of the meeting. First, we describe two types of ‘my side tellings’ found in the reflections. In ‘reporting my side tellings’, the ‘reflectants’ claim to report what they have heard the clients say during the meeting. In ‘inferring my side tellings’, the reflectants claim to present their own cognitive connotations and points of view. Second, we show how these two strategies may be related to ‘recognition’ and ‘interpretation’ as have been described in earlier research on psychotherapy. The empirical findings are discussed in relation to my side tellings in everyday conversation, and to the therapeutic context in particular. My side tellings can be viewed as strategies for expressing both caution and authority when it comes to representing the client's reality, and they may help represent the different ‘voices’ in the sessions.
KW - Conversation analysis
KW - Mental health
KW - My side tellings
KW - Open Dialogue
KW - Psychotherapy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064979147
U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.007
DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85064979147
SN - 0378-2166
VL - 146
SP - 19
EP - 31
JO - Journal of Pragmatics
JF - Journal of Pragmatics
ER -