TY - JOUR
T1 - Redistributive effect, progressivity and differential tax treatment
T2 - personal income taxes in twelve OECD countries
AU - Wagstaff, Adam
AU - Van Doorslaer, Eddy
AU - Van Der Burg, Hattem
AU - Calonge, Samuel
AU - Christiansen, Terkel
AU - Citoni, Guido
AU - Gerdtham, Ulf G.
AU - Gerfin, Michael
AU - Gross, Lorna
AU - Häkinnen, Unto
AU - John, Jürgen
AU - Johnson, Paul
AU - Klavus, Jan
AU - Lachaud, Claire
AU - Lauridsen, Jørgen
AU - Leu, Robert E.
AU - Nolan, Brian
AU - Peran, Encarna
AU - Propper, Carol
AU - Puffer, Frank
AU - Rochaix, Lise
AU - Rodríguez, Marisol
AU - Schellhorn, Martin
AU - Sundberg, Gun
AU - Winkelhake, Olaf
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper derives from the project “Equity in the finance and delivery of health care in Europe” (known as the ECuity Project), which was funded by the European Community's Biomed I programme (contract BMH1-CT92-608) and coordinated by Eddy van Doorslaer and Adam Wagstaff. We are grateful to the EU for financial support. We are also grateful to the other participants in the ECuity Project and to Nanak Kakwani and Peter Lambert for their contributions to the research leading up to this paper. We alone are responsible for any errors.
PY - 1999/4/1
Y1 - 1999/4/1
N2 - This paper decomposes the redistributive effect of the personal income taxes (PITs) of twelve OECD countries into four components: (i) an average rate effect, (ii) a departure-from-proportionality or progressivity effect, (iii) a horizontal equity effect and (iv) a reranking effect. The product of (i) and (ii) indicates the vertical redistribution associated with the PIT and the sum of (iii) and (iv) indicates the impact on the distribution of income of differential tax treatment. The average tax rate is found to be low in France and high in the Nordic countries, and the PIT is found to be most progressive in France, Ireland and Spain, and least progressive in Denmark and Sweden. Taking (i) and (ii) together, Denmark and the US achieve broadly similar levels of vertical redistributive effect. Differential treatment is found to have a much smaller effect on income redistribution (as a proportion of redistributive effect) than the vertical redistribution caused by progressivity, though there are differences between countries. These differences appear to be due principally to a different emphasis on deductions, such as tax deductibility of mortgage interest payments and insurance premiums, and on local income tax.
AB - This paper decomposes the redistributive effect of the personal income taxes (PITs) of twelve OECD countries into four components: (i) an average rate effect, (ii) a departure-from-proportionality or progressivity effect, (iii) a horizontal equity effect and (iv) a reranking effect. The product of (i) and (ii) indicates the vertical redistribution associated with the PIT and the sum of (iii) and (iv) indicates the impact on the distribution of income of differential tax treatment. The average tax rate is found to be low in France and high in the Nordic countries, and the PIT is found to be most progressive in France, Ireland and Spain, and least progressive in Denmark and Sweden. Taking (i) and (ii) together, Denmark and the US achieve broadly similar levels of vertical redistributive effect. Differential treatment is found to have a much smaller effect on income redistribution (as a proportion of redistributive effect) than the vertical redistribution caused by progressivity, though there are differences between countries. These differences appear to be due principally to a different emphasis on deductions, such as tax deductibility of mortgage interest payments and insurance premiums, and on local income tax.
KW - D31
KW - H23
KW - H24
KW - Horizontal equity
KW - Personal income tax
KW - Progressivity
KW - Redistributive effect
KW - Reranking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0043229630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00085-1
DO - 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00085-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0043229630
SN - 0047-2727
VL - 72
SP - 73
EP - 98
JO - Journal of Public Economics
JF - Journal of Public Economics
IS - 1
ER -