Recruiting general practice patients for large clinical trials

lessons from the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study

Jessica E Lockery, Taya A Collyer, Walter P Abhayaratna, Sharyn M Fitzgerald, John J McNeil, Mark R. Nelson, Suzanne G Orchard, Christopher Reid, Nigel P. Stocks, Ruth E Trevaks, Robyn Woods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors that contributed to the successful completion of recruitment for the largest clinical trial ever conducted in Australia, the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study. DESIGN: Enrolment of GPs; identification of potential participants in general practice databases; screening of participants. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Selected general practices across southeast Australia (Tasmania, Victoria, Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, South Australia). MAJOR OUTCOMES: Numbers of patients per GP screened and randomised to participation; geographic and demographic factors that influenced screening and randomising of patients. RESULTS: 2717 of 5833 GPs approached (47%) enrolled to recruit patients for the study; 2053 (76%) recruited at least one randomised participant. The highest randomised participant rate per GP was for Tasmania (median, 5; IQR, 1-11), driven by the high rate of participant inclusion at phone screening. GPs in inner regional (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.84) and outer regional areas (aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.19-2.88) were more likely than GPs in major cities to recruit at least one randomised participant. GPs in areas with a high proportion of people aged 70 years or more were more likely to randomise at least one participant (per percentage point increase: aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15). The number of randomised patients declined with time from GP enrolment to first randomisation. CONCLUSION: General practice can be a rich environment for research when barriers to recruitment are overcome. Including regional GPs and focusing efforts in areas with the highest proportions of potentially eligible participants improves recruitment. The success of ASPREE attests to the clinical importance of its research question for Australian GPs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-173
Number of pages6
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume210
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • General practice
  • Randomized controlled trial as topic
  • Research design

Cite this

@article{fb3b934417714f5c88c8c8c1a0c765cf,
title = "Recruiting general practice patients for large clinical trials: lessons from the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors that contributed to the successful completion of recruitment for the largest clinical trial ever conducted in Australia, the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study. DESIGN: Enrolment of GPs; identification of potential participants in general practice databases; screening of participants. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Selected general practices across southeast Australia (Tasmania, Victoria, Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, South Australia). MAJOR OUTCOMES: Numbers of patients per GP screened and randomised to participation; geographic and demographic factors that influenced screening and randomising of patients. RESULTS: 2717 of 5833 GPs approached (47{\%}) enrolled to recruit patients for the study; 2053 (76{\%}) recruited at least one randomised participant. The highest randomised participant rate per GP was for Tasmania (median, 5; IQR, 1-11), driven by the high rate of participant inclusion at phone screening. GPs in inner regional (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.45; 95{\%} CI, 1.14-1.84) and outer regional areas (aOR, 1.86; 95{\%} CI, 1.19-2.88) were more likely than GPs in major cities to recruit at least one randomised participant. GPs in areas with a high proportion of people aged 70 years or more were more likely to randomise at least one participant (per percentage point increase: aOR, 1.10; 95{\%} CI, 1.05-1.15). The number of randomised patients declined with time from GP enrolment to first randomisation. CONCLUSION: General practice can be a rich environment for research when barriers to recruitment are overcome. Including regional GPs and focusing efforts in areas with the highest proportions of potentially eligible participants improves recruitment. The success of ASPREE attests to the clinical importance of its research question for Australian GPs.",
keywords = "General practice, Randomized controlled trial as topic, Research design",
author = "Lockery, {Jessica E} and Collyer, {Taya A} and Abhayaratna, {Walter P} and Fitzgerald, {Sharyn M} and McNeil, {John J} and Nelson, {Mark R.} and Orchard, {Suzanne G} and Christopher Reid and Stocks, {Nigel P.} and Trevaks, {Ruth E} and Robyn Woods",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5694/mja2.12060",
language = "English",
volume = "210",
pages = "168--173",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "AMPCo",
number = "4",

}

Recruiting general practice patients for large clinical trials : lessons from the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study. / Lockery, Jessica E; Collyer, Taya A; Abhayaratna, Walter P; Fitzgerald, Sharyn M; McNeil, John J; Nelson, Mark R.; Orchard, Suzanne G; Reid, Christopher; Stocks, Nigel P.; Trevaks, Ruth E; Woods, Robyn.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 210, No. 4, 01.03.2019, p. 168-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recruiting general practice patients for large clinical trials

T2 - lessons from the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study

AU - Lockery, Jessica E

AU - Collyer, Taya A

AU - Abhayaratna, Walter P

AU - Fitzgerald, Sharyn M

AU - McNeil, John J

AU - Nelson, Mark R.

AU - Orchard, Suzanne G

AU - Reid, Christopher

AU - Stocks, Nigel P.

AU - Trevaks, Ruth E

AU - Woods, Robyn

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors that contributed to the successful completion of recruitment for the largest clinical trial ever conducted in Australia, the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study. DESIGN: Enrolment of GPs; identification of potential participants in general practice databases; screening of participants. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Selected general practices across southeast Australia (Tasmania, Victoria, Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, South Australia). MAJOR OUTCOMES: Numbers of patients per GP screened and randomised to participation; geographic and demographic factors that influenced screening and randomising of patients. RESULTS: 2717 of 5833 GPs approached (47%) enrolled to recruit patients for the study; 2053 (76%) recruited at least one randomised participant. The highest randomised participant rate per GP was for Tasmania (median, 5; IQR, 1-11), driven by the high rate of participant inclusion at phone screening. GPs in inner regional (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.84) and outer regional areas (aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.19-2.88) were more likely than GPs in major cities to recruit at least one randomised participant. GPs in areas with a high proportion of people aged 70 years or more were more likely to randomise at least one participant (per percentage point increase: aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15). The number of randomised patients declined with time from GP enrolment to first randomisation. CONCLUSION: General practice can be a rich environment for research when barriers to recruitment are overcome. Including regional GPs and focusing efforts in areas with the highest proportions of potentially eligible participants improves recruitment. The success of ASPREE attests to the clinical importance of its research question for Australian GPs.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors that contributed to the successful completion of recruitment for the largest clinical trial ever conducted in Australia, the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study. DESIGN: Enrolment of GPs; identification of potential participants in general practice databases; screening of participants. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Selected general practices across southeast Australia (Tasmania, Victoria, Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, South Australia). MAJOR OUTCOMES: Numbers of patients per GP screened and randomised to participation; geographic and demographic factors that influenced screening and randomising of patients. RESULTS: 2717 of 5833 GPs approached (47%) enrolled to recruit patients for the study; 2053 (76%) recruited at least one randomised participant. The highest randomised participant rate per GP was for Tasmania (median, 5; IQR, 1-11), driven by the high rate of participant inclusion at phone screening. GPs in inner regional (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.84) and outer regional areas (aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.19-2.88) were more likely than GPs in major cities to recruit at least one randomised participant. GPs in areas with a high proportion of people aged 70 years or more were more likely to randomise at least one participant (per percentage point increase: aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15). The number of randomised patients declined with time from GP enrolment to first randomisation. CONCLUSION: General practice can be a rich environment for research when barriers to recruitment are overcome. Including regional GPs and focusing efforts in areas with the highest proportions of potentially eligible participants improves recruitment. The success of ASPREE attests to the clinical importance of its research question for Australian GPs.

KW - General practice

KW - Randomized controlled trial as topic

KW - Research design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062627039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5694/mja2.12060

DO - 10.5694/mja2.12060

M3 - Article

VL - 210

SP - 168

EP - 173

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 4

ER -