Recognising drug and alcohol problems in patients referred to consultation-liaison psychiatry

G. C. Smith, D. M. Clarke, D. Handrinos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To study the extent of recognition by referring doctors of drug and alcohol problems in patients referred to consultation-liaison psychiatry for any reason, and the factors associated with non-recognition. Design: Comparison of referring doctors' reasons for referral and psychiatrists' DSM-III-R diagnoses in 2347 inpatients referred consecutively over three years, by means of the prospective MICRO-CARES clinical database used by the consultation-liaison psychiatry service of each hospital involved. Setting: Four general teaching hospitals of Monash University. Results: Psychiatrists considered a psychoactive substance use disorder diagnosis likely in 336 (14%) of the referred patients; referring doctors missed 188 (56%) of these, referring instead for 'depression', 'anxiety' and 'suicide attempt evaluation'. The factors correlating with this discordance included younger age, male sex, having a personality disorder diagnosed, and having attempted self-harm. Conclusions: The extent of the failure to identify drug and alcohol problems in patients in whom some psychological problem worthy referral to psychiatry had been detected is symptomatic of the extent of this failure in medicine generally. Education and the use of screening procedures may lead to development of coherent drug and alcohol protocols in individual institutions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307, 310-312
Number of pages4
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume163
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1995

Cite this

@article{02a47657b5dd43b39a1289090e8f1970,
title = "Recognising drug and alcohol problems in patients referred to consultation-liaison psychiatry",
abstract = "Objective: To study the extent of recognition by referring doctors of drug and alcohol problems in patients referred to consultation-liaison psychiatry for any reason, and the factors associated with non-recognition. Design: Comparison of referring doctors' reasons for referral and psychiatrists' DSM-III-R diagnoses in 2347 inpatients referred consecutively over three years, by means of the prospective MICRO-CARES clinical database used by the consultation-liaison psychiatry service of each hospital involved. Setting: Four general teaching hospitals of Monash University. Results: Psychiatrists considered a psychoactive substance use disorder diagnosis likely in 336 (14{\%}) of the referred patients; referring doctors missed 188 (56{\%}) of these, referring instead for 'depression', 'anxiety' and 'suicide attempt evaluation'. The factors correlating with this discordance included younger age, male sex, having a personality disorder diagnosed, and having attempted self-harm. Conclusions: The extent of the failure to identify drug and alcohol problems in patients in whom some psychological problem worthy referral to psychiatry had been detected is symptomatic of the extent of this failure in medicine generally. Education and the use of screening procedures may lead to development of coherent drug and alcohol protocols in individual institutions.",
author = "Smith, {G. C.} and Clarke, {D. M.} and D. Handrinos",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "163",
pages = "307, 310--312",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "AMPCo",
number = "6",

}

Recognising drug and alcohol problems in patients referred to consultation-liaison psychiatry. / Smith, G. C.; Clarke, D. M.; Handrinos, D.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 163, No. 6, 01.01.1995, p. 307, 310-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recognising drug and alcohol problems in patients referred to consultation-liaison psychiatry

AU - Smith, G. C.

AU - Clarke, D. M.

AU - Handrinos, D.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Objective: To study the extent of recognition by referring doctors of drug and alcohol problems in patients referred to consultation-liaison psychiatry for any reason, and the factors associated with non-recognition. Design: Comparison of referring doctors' reasons for referral and psychiatrists' DSM-III-R diagnoses in 2347 inpatients referred consecutively over three years, by means of the prospective MICRO-CARES clinical database used by the consultation-liaison psychiatry service of each hospital involved. Setting: Four general teaching hospitals of Monash University. Results: Psychiatrists considered a psychoactive substance use disorder diagnosis likely in 336 (14%) of the referred patients; referring doctors missed 188 (56%) of these, referring instead for 'depression', 'anxiety' and 'suicide attempt evaluation'. The factors correlating with this discordance included younger age, male sex, having a personality disorder diagnosed, and having attempted self-harm. Conclusions: The extent of the failure to identify drug and alcohol problems in patients in whom some psychological problem worthy referral to psychiatry had been detected is symptomatic of the extent of this failure in medicine generally. Education and the use of screening procedures may lead to development of coherent drug and alcohol protocols in individual institutions.

AB - Objective: To study the extent of recognition by referring doctors of drug and alcohol problems in patients referred to consultation-liaison psychiatry for any reason, and the factors associated with non-recognition. Design: Comparison of referring doctors' reasons for referral and psychiatrists' DSM-III-R diagnoses in 2347 inpatients referred consecutively over three years, by means of the prospective MICRO-CARES clinical database used by the consultation-liaison psychiatry service of each hospital involved. Setting: Four general teaching hospitals of Monash University. Results: Psychiatrists considered a psychoactive substance use disorder diagnosis likely in 336 (14%) of the referred patients; referring doctors missed 188 (56%) of these, referring instead for 'depression', 'anxiety' and 'suicide attempt evaluation'. The factors correlating with this discordance included younger age, male sex, having a personality disorder diagnosed, and having attempted self-harm. Conclusions: The extent of the failure to identify drug and alcohol problems in patients in whom some psychological problem worthy referral to psychiatry had been detected is symptomatic of the extent of this failure in medicine generally. Education and the use of screening procedures may lead to development of coherent drug and alcohol protocols in individual institutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029094675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 163

SP - 307, 310-312

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 6

ER -