Real-world utilisation of ASCT in multiple myeloma (MM): a report from the Australian and New Zealand myeloma and related diseases registry (MRDR)

Krystal Bergin, Cameron Wellard, Bradley Augustson, Rachel Cooke, Hilary Blacklock, Simon J. Harrison, Joy Ho, Tracy King, Hang Quach, Peter Mollee, Patricia Walker, Elizabeth Moore, Zoe McQuilten, Erica Wood, Andrew Spencer, on behalf of the Australian and New Zealand Myeloma and Related Diseases Registry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Supported by clinical trial proven survival benefit, clinical guidelines recommend upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for eligible MM patients. However, reported real-world utilisation is lower than expected (40–60%). We reviewed ASCT utilisation, demographics and outcomes for MM patients (≤70 years, ≥12-month follow-up) enroled onto the Australian/New Zealand MRDR from June 2012 to May 2020. In 982 patients (<65 years: 684, 65–70 years: 298), ASCT utilisation was 76% overall (<65 years: 83%, 65–70 years: 61%, front-line therapy: 67%). Non-ASCT recipients were older (median age: 65 years vs 60 years, p < 0.001), had more comorbidities (cardiac disease: 16.9% vs 5.4%, p < 0.001; diabetes: 19.1% vs 7.0%, p < 0.001; renal dysfunction: median eGFR(ml/min): 68 vs 80, p < 0.001), inferior performance status (ECOG ≥ 2: 26% vs 13%, p < 0.001) and higher-risk MM (ISS-3: 37% vs 26%, p = 0.009, R-ISS-3 18.6% vs 11.8%, p = 0.051) than ASCT recipients. ASCT survival benefit (median progression-free survival (PFS): 45.3 months vs 35.2 months, p < 0.001; overall survival (OS): NR vs 64.0 months, p < 0.001) was maintained irrespective of age (<65 years: median PFS: 45.3 months vs 37.7 months, p = 0.04, OS: NR vs 68.2 months, p = 0.002; 65–70 years: median PFS: 46.7 months vs 29.2 months, p < 0.001, OS: 76.9 months vs 55.6 months, p = 0.005). This large, real-world cohort reaffirms ASCT survival benefit, including in ‘older’ patients necessitating well-designed studies evaluating ASCT in ‘older’ MM to inform evidence-based patient selection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2533-2543
Number of pages11
JournalBone Marrow Transplantation
Volume56
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

Cite this