Re-thinking the influence of regulatory capture in the development of government regulation

Kerrie Sadiq, Janet Mack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

On 30 March 2015 the Australian Federal Government launched its Re:think initiative with the objective of achieving a better tax system which delivers taxes that are lower, simpler and fairer. The discussion paper released as part of the Re:think initiative is designed to start a national conversation on tax reform. However, inquiries into Australia s future tax system, subsequent reforms and the introduction of new taxes are nothing new. Unfortunately, recent history also demonstrates that reform initiatives arising from reviews of the Australian tax system are often deemed a failure. The most prominent of these failures in recent times is the Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT), which lasted a mere 16 months before its announced repeal. Using the established theoretic framework of regulatory capture to interpret publically observable data, the purpose of this article is to explain the failure of this arguably sound tax. It concludes that the MRRT legislation itself, through the capture by the mining companies, provided internal subsidisation in the form of reduced tax and minimal or no rents. In doing so, it offers an opportunity to understand and learn from past experiences to ensure that recommendations coming out of the Re:think initiative do not suffer the same fate.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379 - 399
Number of pages21
JournalAustralian Business Law Review
Volume43
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

@article{f1ec8850691142138f6e3b3713d660b8,
title = "Re-thinking the influence of regulatory capture in the development of government regulation",
abstract = "On 30 March 2015 the Australian Federal Government launched its Re:think initiative with the objective of achieving a better tax system which delivers taxes that are lower, simpler and fairer. The discussion paper released as part of the Re:think initiative is designed to start a national conversation on tax reform. However, inquiries into Australia s future tax system, subsequent reforms and the introduction of new taxes are nothing new. Unfortunately, recent history also demonstrates that reform initiatives arising from reviews of the Australian tax system are often deemed a failure. The most prominent of these failures in recent times is the Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT), which lasted a mere 16 months before its announced repeal. Using the established theoretic framework of regulatory capture to interpret publically observable data, the purpose of this article is to explain the failure of this arguably sound tax. It concludes that the MRRT legislation itself, through the capture by the mining companies, provided internal subsidisation in the form of reduced tax and minimal or no rents. In doing so, it offers an opportunity to understand and learn from past experiences to ensure that recommendations coming out of the Re:think initiative do not suffer the same fate.",
author = "Kerrie Sadiq and Janet Mack",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "379 -- 399",
journal = "Australian Business Law Review",
issn = "0310-1053",
publisher = "Thomson Reuters (Prous Science)",
number = "5",

}

Re-thinking the influence of regulatory capture in the development of government regulation. / Sadiq, Kerrie; Mack, Janet.

In: Australian Business Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2015, p. 379 - 399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-thinking the influence of regulatory capture in the development of government regulation

AU - Sadiq, Kerrie

AU - Mack, Janet

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - On 30 March 2015 the Australian Federal Government launched its Re:think initiative with the objective of achieving a better tax system which delivers taxes that are lower, simpler and fairer. The discussion paper released as part of the Re:think initiative is designed to start a national conversation on tax reform. However, inquiries into Australia s future tax system, subsequent reforms and the introduction of new taxes are nothing new. Unfortunately, recent history also demonstrates that reform initiatives arising from reviews of the Australian tax system are often deemed a failure. The most prominent of these failures in recent times is the Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT), which lasted a mere 16 months before its announced repeal. Using the established theoretic framework of regulatory capture to interpret publically observable data, the purpose of this article is to explain the failure of this arguably sound tax. It concludes that the MRRT legislation itself, through the capture by the mining companies, provided internal subsidisation in the form of reduced tax and minimal or no rents. In doing so, it offers an opportunity to understand and learn from past experiences to ensure that recommendations coming out of the Re:think initiative do not suffer the same fate.

AB - On 30 March 2015 the Australian Federal Government launched its Re:think initiative with the objective of achieving a better tax system which delivers taxes that are lower, simpler and fairer. The discussion paper released as part of the Re:think initiative is designed to start a national conversation on tax reform. However, inquiries into Australia s future tax system, subsequent reforms and the introduction of new taxes are nothing new. Unfortunately, recent history also demonstrates that reform initiatives arising from reviews of the Australian tax system are often deemed a failure. The most prominent of these failures in recent times is the Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT), which lasted a mere 16 months before its announced repeal. Using the established theoretic framework of regulatory capture to interpret publically observable data, the purpose of this article is to explain the failure of this arguably sound tax. It concludes that the MRRT legislation itself, through the capture by the mining companies, provided internal subsidisation in the form of reduced tax and minimal or no rents. In doing so, it offers an opportunity to understand and learn from past experiences to ensure that recommendations coming out of the Re:think initiative do not suffer the same fate.

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 379

EP - 399

JO - Australian Business Law Review

JF - Australian Business Law Review

SN - 0310-1053

IS - 5

ER -