Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rasch Analysis of the Independent Mobility Questionnaire

  • Eva K. Fenwick
  • , Fleur O'Hare
  • , Lil Deverell
  • , Lauren N. Ayton
  • , Chi D. Luu
  • , Shane McSweeney
  • , Sharon A. Bentley
  • , Robyn H. Guymer
  • , Robert P. Finger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose The Independent Mobility Questionnaire (IMQ) assesses participants' perceived ability for independent mobility. However, it has not been validated in a severely visually impaired population. The aim of this study was to explore the IMQ's psychometric properties in participants with severe visual impairment. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of 40 participants with retinitis pigmentosa (better eye visual acuity <20/200 and/or visual field <10%). The key psychometric properties of the IMQ were examined using Rasch analysis, including precision, targeting, and item fit. Construct validity was assessed by testing the correlation between the IMQ and the Mobility and Independence infscale of the Impact of Vision Impairment questionnaire (Pearson correlation coefficient, r). Criterion validity was also assessed. Results The IMQ had excellent precision (Person Separation Index, 3.01) with the capacity to distinguish at least four strata of participant ability, and item difficulty was well targeted to participant ability (difference between mean person and item measures,-0.21). Items 34, 35, 21, and 14 displayed misfit (infit MnSq >1.4); however, given our sample size restrictions, these items were not removed from the analysis. The IMQ had good construct validity (moderate correlation with the Impact of Vision Impairment Mobility infscale, r = 0.595, p < 0.05) but did not demonstrate criterion validity. Conclusions The psychometric properties of the IMQ were promising. Our findings are useful for researchers evaluating the effectiveness of novel treatment technologies on mobility in a severely visually impaired population from the participant's perspective. However, further validation studies in larger samples are required to confirm our results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-187
Number of pages7
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Volume93
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • mobility
  • questionnaire
  • Rasch analysis
  • retinitis pigmentosa
  • visual impairment

Cite this