TY - JOUR
T1 - Rapid macrovoid characterization in membranes prepared via nonsolvent-induced phase separation
T2 - a comparison between 2D and 3D techniques
AU - Bridge, Alexander T.
AU - Santoso, Matthew S.
AU - Maisano, Jessica A.
AU - Hillsley, Alexander V.
AU - Brennecke, Joan F.
AU - Freeman, Benny D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Prof. Michael Baldea for providing useful discussion about image processing strategies and the technique proposed in this study. The authors also thank Dave Edey for assistance with ORS Dragonfly software. This paper is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Cooperative Agreement No. EEC-1647722 (A T B., M.S.S., J.F.B., and B.D.F.). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. XCT imaging and associated analysis were supported as part of the Center for Materials for Water and Energy Systems, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy , Office of Science , Basic Energy Sciences under Award #DE-SC0019272.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/11/5
Y1 - 2022/11/5
N2 - Optimizing the performance of asymmetric membranes prepared via nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) requires a quantitative understanding of how processing variables influence membrane morphology. Presently, the most useful structural quantification techniques require 3D visualization of the membrane structure and are best suited for studies seeking detailed information on small datasets. This study proposes and validates a rapid and accurate technique for quantifying macroporosity (i.e., Dm), a simple descriptor of sublayer macrovoid content in asymmetric membranes. Dm values measured from segmented cross-sectional imaging performed via X-ray computed tomography (XCT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are presented and compared for three asymmetric membranes prepared from commercial polymers. Importantly, analyses of 3D XCT membrane reconstructions reveal that Dm is described by a single, centralized mean, which demonstrates that macrovoid content is spatially homogenous. Thus, Dm can be approximated from limited sampling of the 2D cross-sectional membrane structure via SEM. A proposed 2D SEM sampling method provides Dm estimates within ±6% of corresponding 3D XCT values with 30 independent measurements for the three membranes. Further sensitivity is achieved using complementary descriptors such as macrovoid count density (i.e., Cm). This technique is thus a useful tool for characterizing macroporosity from a broad selection of membrane samples.
AB - Optimizing the performance of asymmetric membranes prepared via nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) requires a quantitative understanding of how processing variables influence membrane morphology. Presently, the most useful structural quantification techniques require 3D visualization of the membrane structure and are best suited for studies seeking detailed information on small datasets. This study proposes and validates a rapid and accurate technique for quantifying macroporosity (i.e., Dm), a simple descriptor of sublayer macrovoid content in asymmetric membranes. Dm values measured from segmented cross-sectional imaging performed via X-ray computed tomography (XCT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are presented and compared for three asymmetric membranes prepared from commercial polymers. Importantly, analyses of 3D XCT membrane reconstructions reveal that Dm is described by a single, centralized mean, which demonstrates that macrovoid content is spatially homogenous. Thus, Dm can be approximated from limited sampling of the 2D cross-sectional membrane structure via SEM. A proposed 2D SEM sampling method provides Dm estimates within ±6% of corresponding 3D XCT values with 30 independent measurements for the three membranes. Further sensitivity is achieved using complementary descriptors such as macrovoid count density (i.e., Cm). This technique is thus a useful tool for characterizing macroporosity from a broad selection of membrane samples.
KW - Asymmetric membranes
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Electron microscopy
KW - Image segmentation
KW - Macrovoids
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136294494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120923
DO - 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120923
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85136294494
SN - 0376-7388
VL - 661
JO - Journal of Membrane Science
JF - Journal of Membrane Science
M1 - 120923
ER -