Rapid macrovoid characterization in membranes prepared via nonsolvent-induced phase separation: a comparison between 2D and 3D techniques

Alexander T. Bridge, Matthew S. Santoso, Jessica A. Maisano, Alexander V. Hillsley, Joan F. Brennecke, Benny D. Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Optimizing the performance of asymmetric membranes prepared via nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) requires a quantitative understanding of how processing variables influence membrane morphology. Presently, the most useful structural quantification techniques require 3D visualization of the membrane structure and are best suited for studies seeking detailed information on small datasets. This study proposes and validates a rapid and accurate technique for quantifying macroporosity (i.e., Dm), a simple descriptor of sublayer macrovoid content in asymmetric membranes. Dm values measured from segmented cross-sectional imaging performed via X-ray computed tomography (XCT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are presented and compared for three asymmetric membranes prepared from commercial polymers. Importantly, analyses of 3D XCT membrane reconstructions reveal that Dm is described by a single, centralized mean, which demonstrates that macrovoid content is spatially homogenous. Thus, Dm can be approximated from limited sampling of the 2D cross-sectional membrane structure via SEM. A proposed 2D SEM sampling method provides Dm estimates within ±6% of corresponding 3D XCT values with 30 independent measurements for the three membranes. Further sensitivity is achieved using complementary descriptors such as macrovoid count density (i.e., Cm). This technique is thus a useful tool for characterizing macroporosity from a broad selection of membrane samples.

Original languageEnglish
Article number120923
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Membrane Science
Volume661
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Nov 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Asymmetric membranes
  • Computed tomography
  • Electron microscopy
  • Image segmentation
  • Macrovoids

Cite this