TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiation myelopathy following stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine metastases
AU - Ong, Wee Loon
AU - Wong, Shun
AU - Soliman, Hany
AU - Myrehaug, Sten
AU - Tseng, Chia Lin
AU - Detsky, Jay
AU - Husain, Zain
AU - Maralani, Pejman
AU - Ma, Lijun
AU - Lo, Simon S.
AU - Sahgal, Arjun
N1 - Funding Information:
WLO, SW, HS, SM, JD, ZH, PM, LM declare they have no financial interests. CT has been an advisor/consultant for Sanofi, received travel accommodations/expenses and honoraria for past educational seminars by Elekta and belongs to the Elekta MR Linac Research Consortium. SL is a member of the Elekta Gamma Knife ICON Expert Group. AS has been a consultant with Varian (Medical Advisory Group), Elekta (Gamma Knife Icon), BrainLAB, Merck, Abbvie, Roche; Board Member to International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS); Advisory Board with VieCure; Co-Chair with AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor; received honorarium for past educational seminars with AstraZeneca, Elekta AB, Varian (CNS Teaching Faculty), BrainLAB, Medtronic Kyphon, Accuray; research grant with Elekta AB, Varian; and travel accommodations/expenses by Elekta, Varian and BrainLAB; also belongs to the Elekta MR Linac Research Consortium, Elekta Spine, Elekta Oligometastases and Elekta Linac Based SRS Consortia.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now considered a standard of care treatment option in the management of spine metastases. One of the most feared complications of spine SBRT is radiation myelopathy (RM). Methods: We provided a narrative review of RM following spine SBRT based on review of the published literature, including data on spinal cord dose constraints associated with the risk of RM, strategies to mitigate the risk, and management options for RM. Results: There are limited published data of cases of RM following spine SBRT with detailed spinal cord dosimetry. The HyTEC report provided recommendations for the point maximal dose (Dmax) for the spinal cord that is associated with a < 5% risk of RM for 1–5 fractions spine SBRT. In the setting of spine SBRT reirradiation after previous conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT), factors associated with RM are: SBRT spinal cord Dmax, cumulative spinal cord Dmax, and the time interval between previous RT and SBRT reirradiation. There are various strategies to mitigate the risk of RM, including accurate delineation of the spinal cord (or thecal sac), strict adherence to the recommended spinal cord dose constraints, and robust treatment immobilisation set-up and delivery. Limited effective treatment options are available for patients who develop RM, and these include corticosteroids, hyperbaric oxygen, and bevacizumab; however, none have been supported by high quality evidence. Conclusion: RM is a rare but devastating complication following SBRT for spine metastases. There are strategies to minimise the risk of RM to ensure safe delivery of spine SBRT.
AB - Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now considered a standard of care treatment option in the management of spine metastases. One of the most feared complications of spine SBRT is radiation myelopathy (RM). Methods: We provided a narrative review of RM following spine SBRT based on review of the published literature, including data on spinal cord dose constraints associated with the risk of RM, strategies to mitigate the risk, and management options for RM. Results: There are limited published data of cases of RM following spine SBRT with detailed spinal cord dosimetry. The HyTEC report provided recommendations for the point maximal dose (Dmax) for the spinal cord that is associated with a < 5% risk of RM for 1–5 fractions spine SBRT. In the setting of spine SBRT reirradiation after previous conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT), factors associated with RM are: SBRT spinal cord Dmax, cumulative spinal cord Dmax, and the time interval between previous RT and SBRT reirradiation. There are various strategies to mitigate the risk of RM, including accurate delineation of the spinal cord (or thecal sac), strict adherence to the recommended spinal cord dose constraints, and robust treatment immobilisation set-up and delivery. Limited effective treatment options are available for patients who develop RM, and these include corticosteroids, hyperbaric oxygen, and bevacizumab; however, none have been supported by high quality evidence. Conclusion: RM is a rare but devastating complication following SBRT for spine metastases. There are strategies to minimise the risk of RM to ensure safe delivery of spine SBRT.
KW - Radiation myelopathy
KW - SBRT
KW - Spinal cord
KW - Spine metastases
KW - Toxicity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132570518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11060-022-04037-0
DO - 10.1007/s11060-022-04037-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 35737172
AN - SCOPUS:85132570518
SN - 0167-594X
VL - 159
SP - 23
EP - 31
JO - Journal of Neuro-Oncology
JF - Journal of Neuro-Oncology
IS - 1
ER -