Quality of evidence on pre-eclampsia in the last three decades

An analysis of published literature

Hannah T.Y. Wang, Alston G.J. Ong, James M. Kemper, Ben W. Mol, Daniel L. Rolnik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: In recent years, there has been an increasing amount of information published on pre-eclampsia. We analyzed trends in pre-eclampsia literature between 1997 and 2016 and reported on the quality and utility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between 1987 and 2016. Methods: We searched PubMed for all articles containing “pre-eclampsia” or “hypertensive disorders of pregnancy” in the title between 1997 and 2016 for the general literature and between 1987 and 2016 for RCTs. An analysis was performed based on study type, languages and publications from high-impact journals. Specific to RCTs, a quality and utility analysis based on the CONSORT guidelines and a usefulness checklist was adapted. An analysis by continents and proportion of RCTs published was also performed. Bibliometric network maps were created to determine trends in pre-eclampsia literature. Results: In total, 9654 articles were identified, with a doubling in the number of annual average publications from 310 to 655 between 1997 and 2016. This increase occurred in both English and non-English publications. There was a decline in the proportion of publications from selected high-impact journals from 22% in 1997–2001 to 8% in 2012–2016. Out of the available 130 RCTs that we analyzed, the number of RCTs published in 5-yearly periods remained relatively stable between 1987 and 2016, with quality and utility scores increasing from 24.6 and 11.6 to 31.9 and 13.3, respectively. A geographical search by continents showed that North America produced the majority of RCTs, followed by Asia and Europe. For completed pre-eclampsia trials that were registered between 2005 and 2014, only 68% resulted in peer-reviewed publications. Conclusion: The yearly number of publications on pre-eclampsia has substantially increased, with a stable number of high-level study types and publications from high-impact journals. The reporting quality and usefulness of RCTs relating to pre-eclampsia have improved over time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-74
Number of pages8
JournalPregnancy Hypertension
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Keywords

  • Medical research
  • Pre-eclampsia
  • Quality
  • Randomized trials

Cite this

@article{bd3d3d05fd884c9395fb8893a5b5e2ee,
title = "Quality of evidence on pre-eclampsia in the last three decades: An analysis of published literature",
abstract = "Objectives: In recent years, there has been an increasing amount of information published on pre-eclampsia. We analyzed trends in pre-eclampsia literature between 1997 and 2016 and reported on the quality and utility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between 1987 and 2016. Methods: We searched PubMed for all articles containing “pre-eclampsia” or “hypertensive disorders of pregnancy” in the title between 1997 and 2016 for the general literature and between 1987 and 2016 for RCTs. An analysis was performed based on study type, languages and publications from high-impact journals. Specific to RCTs, a quality and utility analysis based on the CONSORT guidelines and a usefulness checklist was adapted. An analysis by continents and proportion of RCTs published was also performed. Bibliometric network maps were created to determine trends in pre-eclampsia literature. Results: In total, 9654 articles were identified, with a doubling in the number of annual average publications from 310 to 655 between 1997 and 2016. This increase occurred in both English and non-English publications. There was a decline in the proportion of publications from selected high-impact journals from 22{\%} in 1997–2001 to 8{\%} in 2012–2016. Out of the available 130 RCTs that we analyzed, the number of RCTs published in 5-yearly periods remained relatively stable between 1987 and 2016, with quality and utility scores increasing from 24.6 and 11.6 to 31.9 and 13.3, respectively. A geographical search by continents showed that North America produced the majority of RCTs, followed by Asia and Europe. For completed pre-eclampsia trials that were registered between 2005 and 2014, only 68{\%} resulted in peer-reviewed publications. Conclusion: The yearly number of publications on pre-eclampsia has substantially increased, with a stable number of high-level study types and publications from high-impact journals. The reporting quality and usefulness of RCTs relating to pre-eclampsia have improved over time.",
keywords = "Medical research, Pre-eclampsia, Quality, Randomized trials",
author = "Wang, {Hannah T.Y.} and Ong, {Alston G.J.} and Kemper, {James M.} and Mol, {Ben W.} and Rolnik, {Daniel L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.preghy.2019.09.005",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "67--74",
journal = "Pregnancy Hypertension",
issn = "2210-7789",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Quality of evidence on pre-eclampsia in the last three decades : An analysis of published literature. / Wang, Hannah T.Y.; Ong, Alston G.J.; Kemper, James M.; Mol, Ben W.; Rolnik, Daniel L.

In: Pregnancy Hypertension, Vol. 18, 01.10.2019, p. 67-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of evidence on pre-eclampsia in the last three decades

T2 - An analysis of published literature

AU - Wang, Hannah T.Y.

AU - Ong, Alston G.J.

AU - Kemper, James M.

AU - Mol, Ben W.

AU - Rolnik, Daniel L.

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Objectives: In recent years, there has been an increasing amount of information published on pre-eclampsia. We analyzed trends in pre-eclampsia literature between 1997 and 2016 and reported on the quality and utility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between 1987 and 2016. Methods: We searched PubMed for all articles containing “pre-eclampsia” or “hypertensive disorders of pregnancy” in the title between 1997 and 2016 for the general literature and between 1987 and 2016 for RCTs. An analysis was performed based on study type, languages and publications from high-impact journals. Specific to RCTs, a quality and utility analysis based on the CONSORT guidelines and a usefulness checklist was adapted. An analysis by continents and proportion of RCTs published was also performed. Bibliometric network maps were created to determine trends in pre-eclampsia literature. Results: In total, 9654 articles were identified, with a doubling in the number of annual average publications from 310 to 655 between 1997 and 2016. This increase occurred in both English and non-English publications. There was a decline in the proportion of publications from selected high-impact journals from 22% in 1997–2001 to 8% in 2012–2016. Out of the available 130 RCTs that we analyzed, the number of RCTs published in 5-yearly periods remained relatively stable between 1987 and 2016, with quality and utility scores increasing from 24.6 and 11.6 to 31.9 and 13.3, respectively. A geographical search by continents showed that North America produced the majority of RCTs, followed by Asia and Europe. For completed pre-eclampsia trials that were registered between 2005 and 2014, only 68% resulted in peer-reviewed publications. Conclusion: The yearly number of publications on pre-eclampsia has substantially increased, with a stable number of high-level study types and publications from high-impact journals. The reporting quality and usefulness of RCTs relating to pre-eclampsia have improved over time.

AB - Objectives: In recent years, there has been an increasing amount of information published on pre-eclampsia. We analyzed trends in pre-eclampsia literature between 1997 and 2016 and reported on the quality and utility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between 1987 and 2016. Methods: We searched PubMed for all articles containing “pre-eclampsia” or “hypertensive disorders of pregnancy” in the title between 1997 and 2016 for the general literature and between 1987 and 2016 for RCTs. An analysis was performed based on study type, languages and publications from high-impact journals. Specific to RCTs, a quality and utility analysis based on the CONSORT guidelines and a usefulness checklist was adapted. An analysis by continents and proportion of RCTs published was also performed. Bibliometric network maps were created to determine trends in pre-eclampsia literature. Results: In total, 9654 articles were identified, with a doubling in the number of annual average publications from 310 to 655 between 1997 and 2016. This increase occurred in both English and non-English publications. There was a decline in the proportion of publications from selected high-impact journals from 22% in 1997–2001 to 8% in 2012–2016. Out of the available 130 RCTs that we analyzed, the number of RCTs published in 5-yearly periods remained relatively stable between 1987 and 2016, with quality and utility scores increasing from 24.6 and 11.6 to 31.9 and 13.3, respectively. A geographical search by continents showed that North America produced the majority of RCTs, followed by Asia and Europe. For completed pre-eclampsia trials that were registered between 2005 and 2014, only 68% resulted in peer-reviewed publications. Conclusion: The yearly number of publications on pre-eclampsia has substantially increased, with a stable number of high-level study types and publications from high-impact journals. The reporting quality and usefulness of RCTs relating to pre-eclampsia have improved over time.

KW - Medical research

KW - Pre-eclampsia

KW - Quality

KW - Randomized trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072536319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.preghy.2019.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.preghy.2019.09.005

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 67

EP - 74

JO - Pregnancy Hypertension

JF - Pregnancy Hypertension

SN - 2210-7789

ER -