Quality management approaches and their impact on firms' financial performance: An Australian study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The study of small manufacturing firms typically focuses on issues of entrepreneurship, business or operations strategy. Alternate issues remain scarce, and the implications for organisational performance are modest. In the Australian context, managers have often been criticised for their failure to recognise that quality and innovation are a key driving force to performance. This research utilises the work of several authors to develop quality orientations for small Australian manufacturing firms (SAMFs) to purposefully bridge the gaps in the business literature, and enable the evaluation of various performance outcomes. Specifically, this study investigates whether a firm×s stated quality orientation is useful in differentiating firm performance. The research utilises longitudinal panel data gathered by the Australian Bureau of Statistics growth and performance survey over four years from financial year 1995 to 1998. We demonstrate that firm quality management orientation does provide a statistically significant financial performance advantage (and by inference survival advantage) over those SAMFs who do not engage in quality management. The research is a significant addition to the quality - financial performance literature, and provides a pathway forward for the use of two new financial (productivity) ratios as performance measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-393
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Production Economics
Volume171
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Financial performance
  • Manufacturing
  • Quality management
  • Quantitative
  • Secondary data
  • SME

Cite this

@article{8558b3c58a1346ea827b31dc7af5ba1d,
title = "Quality management approaches and their impact on firms' financial performance: An Australian study",
abstract = "The study of small manufacturing firms typically focuses on issues of entrepreneurship, business or operations strategy. Alternate issues remain scarce, and the implications for organisational performance are modest. In the Australian context, managers have often been criticised for their failure to recognise that quality and innovation are a key driving force to performance. This research utilises the work of several authors to develop quality orientations for small Australian manufacturing firms (SAMFs) to purposefully bridge the gaps in the business literature, and enable the evaluation of various performance outcomes. Specifically, this study investigates whether a firm×s stated quality orientation is useful in differentiating firm performance. The research utilises longitudinal panel data gathered by the Australian Bureau of Statistics growth and performance survey over four years from financial year 1995 to 1998. We demonstrate that firm quality management orientation does provide a statistically significant financial performance advantage (and by inference survival advantage) over those SAMFs who do not engage in quality management. The research is a significant addition to the quality - financial performance literature, and provides a pathway forward for the use of two new financial (productivity) ratios as performance measures.",
keywords = "Australia, Financial performance, Manufacturing, Quality management, Quantitative, Secondary data, SME",
author = "O'Neill, {Peter Joseph} and Sohal, {Amrik Singh} and Teng, {Chih Wei}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.015",
language = "English",
volume = "171",
pages = "381--393",
journal = "International Journal of Production Economics",
issn = "0925-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Quality management approaches and their impact on firms' financial performance : An Australian study. / O'Neill, Peter Joseph; Sohal, Amrik Singh; Teng, Chih Wei.

In: International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 171, No. 3, 2016, p. 381-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality management approaches and their impact on firms' financial performance

T2 - An Australian study

AU - O'Neill, Peter Joseph

AU - Sohal, Amrik Singh

AU - Teng, Chih Wei

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The study of small manufacturing firms typically focuses on issues of entrepreneurship, business or operations strategy. Alternate issues remain scarce, and the implications for organisational performance are modest. In the Australian context, managers have often been criticised for their failure to recognise that quality and innovation are a key driving force to performance. This research utilises the work of several authors to develop quality orientations for small Australian manufacturing firms (SAMFs) to purposefully bridge the gaps in the business literature, and enable the evaluation of various performance outcomes. Specifically, this study investigates whether a firm×s stated quality orientation is useful in differentiating firm performance. The research utilises longitudinal panel data gathered by the Australian Bureau of Statistics growth and performance survey over four years from financial year 1995 to 1998. We demonstrate that firm quality management orientation does provide a statistically significant financial performance advantage (and by inference survival advantage) over those SAMFs who do not engage in quality management. The research is a significant addition to the quality - financial performance literature, and provides a pathway forward for the use of two new financial (productivity) ratios as performance measures.

AB - The study of small manufacturing firms typically focuses on issues of entrepreneurship, business or operations strategy. Alternate issues remain scarce, and the implications for organisational performance are modest. In the Australian context, managers have often been criticised for their failure to recognise that quality and innovation are a key driving force to performance. This research utilises the work of several authors to develop quality orientations for small Australian manufacturing firms (SAMFs) to purposefully bridge the gaps in the business literature, and enable the evaluation of various performance outcomes. Specifically, this study investigates whether a firm×s stated quality orientation is useful in differentiating firm performance. The research utilises longitudinal panel data gathered by the Australian Bureau of Statistics growth and performance survey over four years from financial year 1995 to 1998. We demonstrate that firm quality management orientation does provide a statistically significant financial performance advantage (and by inference survival advantage) over those SAMFs who do not engage in quality management. The research is a significant addition to the quality - financial performance literature, and provides a pathway forward for the use of two new financial (productivity) ratios as performance measures.

KW - Australia

KW - Financial performance

KW - Manufacturing

KW - Quality management

KW - Quantitative

KW - Secondary data

KW - SME

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954043970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.015

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.015

M3 - Article

VL - 171

SP - 381

EP - 393

JO - International Journal of Production Economics

JF - International Journal of Production Economics

SN - 0925-5273

IS - 3

ER -