Quality Indicators for Global Benchmarking of Localized Prostate Cancer Management

Fanny Sampurno, Jia Zheng, Lydia Di Stefano, Jeremy L. Millar, Claire Foster, Ferran Fuedea, Celestia Higano, Hartwig Hulan, Stephen Mark, Caroline Moore, Alison Richardson, Frank Sullivan, Neil S. Wenger, Daniela Wittmann, Sue Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to develop a core set of clinical indicators to enable international benchmarking of localized prostate cancer management using data available in the TrueNTH Global Registry. Materials and Methods: An international expert panel completed an online survey and participated in a face-to-face meeting. Participants included 3 urologists, 3 radiation oncologists, 2 psychologists, 1 medical oncologist, 1 nurse and 1 epidemiologist with prostate cancer expertise from a total of 7 countries. Current guidelines on prostate cancer treatment and potential quality indicators were identified from a literature review. These potential indicators were refined and developed through a modified Delphi process during which each panelist independently and repeatedly rated each indicator based on importance (satisfying the indicator demonstrated a provision of high quality care) and feasibility (the likelihood that data used to construct the indicator could be collected at a population level). The main outcome measure was items with panel agreement indicated by a disagreement index less 1, median importance 8.5 or greater and median feasibility 9 or greater. Results: The expert panel endorsed 33 indicators. Seven of these 33 prostate cancer quality indicators assessed care relating to diagnosis, 7 assessed primary treatment, 1 assessed salvage treatment and 18 assessed health outcomes. Conclusions: We developed a set of quality indicators to measure prostate cancer care using numerous international evidence-based clinical guidelines. These indicators will be pilot tested in the TrueNTH Global Registry. Reports comparing indicator performance will subsequently be distributed to groups at participating sites with the purpose of improving the consistency and quality of prostate cancer management on a global basis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-326
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume200
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Delphi technique
  • evidence-based medicine
  • health care
  • practice guidelines as topic
  • prostatic neoplasms
  • quality indicators

Cite this