Quality in general practice - definitions and frameworks

Karina Gardner, Danielle Mazza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In 2010, the federal government introduced the first comprehensive national policy statement for primary healthcare in Australia. This policy identifies key reform initiatives with the overall aim of improving the quality of healthcare. However, what constitutes quality and how to measure it is the subject of ongoing debate both nationally and internationally. Objective: In this article we explore the current experience of defining quality and implementing quality frameworks in general practice settings in New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. Discussion: There are multiple and varying definitions of quality in general practice, but most emphasise patient experience as their primary focus. The quality frameworks used in the countries investigated are all based on Donabedian s systems-based framework of structure, process and outcome. Implementation and application varies however, with top-down approaches in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, and bottom-up approaches in Germany. Provision of high quality care is the primary goal in all the systems described. External standards, targets and incentives are important initiatives, but countries with high quality general practice excel at empowering general practice to own the quality agenda.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151 - 154
Number of pages4
JournalAustralian Family Physician
Volume41
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this