Qua solution, 0-qua has problems

Grace Paterson, David Ripley, Andrew Tedder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review


We present an objection to Beall & Henderson’s recent paper defending a solution to the fundamental problem of conciliar Christology using qua or secundum clauses. We argue that certain claims the acceptance/rejection of which distinguish the Conciliar Christian from others fail to so distinguish on Beall & Henderson’s 0-Qua view. This is because on their 0-Qua account, these claims are either acceptable both to Conciliar Christians as well as those who are not Conciliar Christians or because they are acceptable to neither
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-411
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Analytic Theology
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Cite this