Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review

Marjan Faber; Marije Bosch; Hub Wollersheim; Sheila Leatherman; Richard Grol

Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review

Marjan Faber, Marije Bosch, Hub Wollersheim, Sheila Leatherman, Richard Grol

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

To review the weight consumers give to quality-of-care information in the process of choice, to summarize the effect of presentation formats, and to examine the impact of quality information on consumers choice behavior. The evidence is organized in a theoretical consumer choice model

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1 - 8
Number of pages	8
Journal	Medical Care
Volume	47
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - 2009
Externally published	Yes

Cite this

@article{93bba7d25a494e5a94ec41e904a1bb95,

title = "Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review",

abstract = "To review the weight consumers give to quality-of-care information in the process of choice, to summarize the effect of presentation formats, and to examine the impact of quality information on consumers choice behavior. The evidence is organized in a theoretical consumer choice model",

author = "Marjan Faber and Marije Bosch and Hub Wollersheim and Sheila Leatherman and Richard Grol",

year = "2009",

language = "English",

volume = "47",

pages = "1 -- 8",

journal = "Medical Care",

issn = "1537-1948",

publisher = "American Public Health Association",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review

AU - Faber, Marjan

AU - Bosch, Marije

AU - Wollersheim, Hub

AU - Leatherman, Sheila

AU - Grol, Richard

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - To review the weight consumers give to quality-of-care information in the process of choice, to summarize the effect of presentation formats, and to examine the impact of quality information on consumers choice behavior. The evidence is organized in a theoretical consumer choice model

AB - To review the weight consumers give to quality-of-care information in the process of choice, to summarize the effect of presentation formats, and to examine the impact of quality information on consumers choice behavior. The evidence is organized in a theoretical consumer choice model

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106724

M3 - Article

SN - 1537-1948

VL - 47

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

IS - 1

ER -

Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review

Abstract

Other files and links

Cite this