Public health in Australasian emergency departments

Attitudes, barriers and current practices

Diana Egerton-Warburton, Andrew Gosbell, Katie Moore, George A. Jelinek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To understand the attitudes of consultant emergency medicine physicians and advanced trainees and the perceived barriers to public health interventions in Australasian EDs. Methods: This was a voluntary cross-sectional, mixed-methods online survey of consultant emergency physicians and advanced trainees of the ACEM, conducted between December 2011 and March 2012. Results: Eight hundred and fifty-six ACEM members responded to the survey - a response rate of 33%. A similar number of consultants (70%) and trainees (75%) believed public health initiatives should be provided in the ED. Barriers identified by a similar majority of consultants and trainees to the implementation of public health interventions in EDs included dedicated time available for staff to be involved; available public health resources; available funding; clinical staff skills and expertise in public health; and the availability of staff training. Conclusions: Public health and health promotion are perceived by the majority of emergency medicine physicians as important in emergency medicine; however, substantial barriers exists to their implementation. Development of an evidence-based approach to public health interventions, which are effective and feasible in the ED environment, will facilitate a more comprehensive approach to public health initiatives in emergency medicine.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)522-528
Number of pages7
JournalEMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

Keywords

  • Barrier
  • Emergency medicine
  • Emergency physician
  • Public health

Cite this

@article{8c78a4b72472451eb7c9e9e2a499b427,
title = "Public health in Australasian emergency departments: Attitudes, barriers and current practices",
abstract = "Objective: To understand the attitudes of consultant emergency medicine physicians and advanced trainees and the perceived barriers to public health interventions in Australasian EDs. Methods: This was a voluntary cross-sectional, mixed-methods online survey of consultant emergency physicians and advanced trainees of the ACEM, conducted between December 2011 and March 2012. Results: Eight hundred and fifty-six ACEM members responded to the survey - a response rate of 33{\%}. A similar number of consultants (70{\%}) and trainees (75{\%}) believed public health initiatives should be provided in the ED. Barriers identified by a similar majority of consultants and trainees to the implementation of public health interventions in EDs included dedicated time available for staff to be involved; available public health resources; available funding; clinical staff skills and expertise in public health; and the availability of staff training. Conclusions: Public health and health promotion are perceived by the majority of emergency medicine physicians as important in emergency medicine; however, substantial barriers exists to their implementation. Development of an evidence-based approach to public health interventions, which are effective and feasible in the ED environment, will facilitate a more comprehensive approach to public health initiatives in emergency medicine.",
keywords = "Barrier, Emergency medicine, Emergency physician, Public health",
author = "Diana Egerton-Warburton and Andrew Gosbell and Katie Moore and Jelinek, {George A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1742-6723.12475",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "522--528",
journal = "EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia",
issn = "1742-6731",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Public health in Australasian emergency departments : Attitudes, barriers and current practices. / Egerton-Warburton, Diana; Gosbell, Andrew; Moore, Katie; Jelinek, George A.

In: EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia, Vol. 27, No. 6, 01.12.2015, p. 522-528.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public health in Australasian emergency departments

T2 - Attitudes, barriers and current practices

AU - Egerton-Warburton, Diana

AU - Gosbell, Andrew

AU - Moore, Katie

AU - Jelinek, George A.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Objective: To understand the attitudes of consultant emergency medicine physicians and advanced trainees and the perceived barriers to public health interventions in Australasian EDs. Methods: This was a voluntary cross-sectional, mixed-methods online survey of consultant emergency physicians and advanced trainees of the ACEM, conducted between December 2011 and March 2012. Results: Eight hundred and fifty-six ACEM members responded to the survey - a response rate of 33%. A similar number of consultants (70%) and trainees (75%) believed public health initiatives should be provided in the ED. Barriers identified by a similar majority of consultants and trainees to the implementation of public health interventions in EDs included dedicated time available for staff to be involved; available public health resources; available funding; clinical staff skills and expertise in public health; and the availability of staff training. Conclusions: Public health and health promotion are perceived by the majority of emergency medicine physicians as important in emergency medicine; however, substantial barriers exists to their implementation. Development of an evidence-based approach to public health interventions, which are effective and feasible in the ED environment, will facilitate a more comprehensive approach to public health initiatives in emergency medicine.

AB - Objective: To understand the attitudes of consultant emergency medicine physicians and advanced trainees and the perceived barriers to public health interventions in Australasian EDs. Methods: This was a voluntary cross-sectional, mixed-methods online survey of consultant emergency physicians and advanced trainees of the ACEM, conducted between December 2011 and March 2012. Results: Eight hundred and fifty-six ACEM members responded to the survey - a response rate of 33%. A similar number of consultants (70%) and trainees (75%) believed public health initiatives should be provided in the ED. Barriers identified by a similar majority of consultants and trainees to the implementation of public health interventions in EDs included dedicated time available for staff to be involved; available public health resources; available funding; clinical staff skills and expertise in public health; and the availability of staff training. Conclusions: Public health and health promotion are perceived by the majority of emergency medicine physicians as important in emergency medicine; however, substantial barriers exists to their implementation. Development of an evidence-based approach to public health interventions, which are effective and feasible in the ED environment, will facilitate a more comprehensive approach to public health initiatives in emergency medicine.

KW - Barrier

KW - Emergency medicine

KW - Emergency physician

KW - Public health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940990288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1742-6723.12475

DO - 10.1111/1742-6723.12475

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 522

EP - 528

JO - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

JF - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

SN - 1742-6731

IS - 6

ER -