TY - JOUR
T1 - Protocol for a prospective, school-based standardisation study of a digital social skills assessment tool for children
T2 - The Paediatric Evaluation of Emotions, Relationships, and Socialisation (PEERS) study
AU - Thompson, Emma J.
AU - Beauchamp, Miriam H.
AU - Darling, Simone J.
AU - Hearps, Stephen J.C.
AU - Brown, Amy
AU - Charalambous, George
AU - Crossley, Louise
AU - Darby, David
AU - Dooley, Julian J.
AU - Greenham, Mardee
AU - Jaimangal, Mohinder
AU - McDonald, Skye
AU - Muscara, Frank
AU - Turkstra, Lyn
AU - Anderson, Vicki A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This work was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Development Grant Scheme (GNT1093528).
Funding Information:
Competing interests The authors would like to declare that although the PEERS app was intended to be a freely available research tool at the commencement of its design, it is now likely to be a commercial product. VA, MHB, GC, DD, JJD, SJD, MJ, SMD, FM and LT all declare a pending patent on the PEERS app. GC and MJ declare fees received from the Murdoch Children's Research Institute for services rendered in the development of the PEERS app. VA, SJD, FM and LT report grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council for the present study. DD reports fees received from The Royal Children's Hospital.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Background Humans are by nature a social species, with much of human experience spent in social interaction. Unsurprisingly, social functioning is crucial to well-being and quality of life across the lifespan. While early intervention for social problems appears promising, our ability to identify the specific impairments underlying their social problems (eg, social communication) is restricted by a dearth of accurate, ecologically valid and comprehensive child-direct assessment tools. Current tools are largely limited to parent and teacher ratings scales, which may identify social dysfunction, but not its underlying cause, or adult-based experimental tools, which lack age-appropriate norms. The present study describes the development and standardisation of Paediatric Evaluation of Emotions, Relationships, and Socialisation (PEERS®), an iPad-based social skills assessment tool. Methods The PEERS project is a cross-sectional study involving two groups: (1) a normative group, recruited from early childhood, primary and secondary schools across metropolitan and regional Victoria, Australia; and (2) a clinical group, ascertained from outpatient services at The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne (RCH). The project aims to establish normative data for PEERS®, a novel and comprehensive app-delivered child-direct measure of social skills for children and youth. The project involves recruiting and assessing 1000 children aged 4.0-17.11 years. Assessments consist of an intellectual screen, PEERS® subtests, and PEERS-Q, a self-report questionnaire of social skills. Parents and teachers also complete questionnaires relating to participants' social skills. Main analyses will comprise regression-based continuous norming, factor analysis and psychometric analysis of PEERS® and PEERS-Q. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval has been obtained through the RCH Human Research Ethics Committee (34046), the Victorian Government Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (002318), and Catholic Education Melbourne (2166). Findings will be disseminated through international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Following standardisation of PEERS®, the tool will be made commercially available.
AB - Background Humans are by nature a social species, with much of human experience spent in social interaction. Unsurprisingly, social functioning is crucial to well-being and quality of life across the lifespan. While early intervention for social problems appears promising, our ability to identify the specific impairments underlying their social problems (eg, social communication) is restricted by a dearth of accurate, ecologically valid and comprehensive child-direct assessment tools. Current tools are largely limited to parent and teacher ratings scales, which may identify social dysfunction, but not its underlying cause, or adult-based experimental tools, which lack age-appropriate norms. The present study describes the development and standardisation of Paediatric Evaluation of Emotions, Relationships, and Socialisation (PEERS®), an iPad-based social skills assessment tool. Methods The PEERS project is a cross-sectional study involving two groups: (1) a normative group, recruited from early childhood, primary and secondary schools across metropolitan and regional Victoria, Australia; and (2) a clinical group, ascertained from outpatient services at The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne (RCH). The project aims to establish normative data for PEERS®, a novel and comprehensive app-delivered child-direct measure of social skills for children and youth. The project involves recruiting and assessing 1000 children aged 4.0-17.11 years. Assessments consist of an intellectual screen, PEERS® subtests, and PEERS-Q, a self-report questionnaire of social skills. Parents and teachers also complete questionnaires relating to participants' social skills. Main analyses will comprise regression-based continuous norming, factor analysis and psychometric analysis of PEERS® and PEERS-Q. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval has been obtained through the RCH Human Research Ethics Committee (34046), the Victorian Government Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (002318), and Catholic Education Melbourne (2166). Findings will be disseminated through international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Following standardisation of PEERS®, the tool will be made commercially available.
KW - adolescent
KW - child
KW - development
KW - social cognition
KW - test measurement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85052166466
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016633
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016633
M3 - Article
C2 - 29439065
AN - SCOPUS:85052166466
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 8
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 2
M1 - e016633
ER -