TY - JOUR
T1 - Proterozoic tectonics of eastern South China
T2 - From ca. 1.45 Ga rifting in the interior of Columbia to a long-lived convergent orogen at the periphery of Rodinia
AU - Wang, Yuejun
AU - Zhang, Yuzhi
AU - Cawood, Peter A.
AU - Wang, Cheng
AU - Gan, Chengshi
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank L-S Shu, S-Y Yu, and an anonymous reviewer for their thorough, critical and constructive reviews and comments, and Profs. Yildirim Dilek, Santosh M and Y-P Dong for their editorial advices. We acknowledge the National Key Research and Development Program of China ( 2023YFF0803701 ), National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 42330302 and 41830211 ), Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) ( SML2023SP206 ) and Australian Research Council ( FL160100168 ) for financial support. Drs. X Qian, C Xu, Y-Q Yu, H-S Wu, C-S Gan, L-M Zhang, A-M Zhang, X-Q Yu and T-X Yang are gratefully acknowledged for their data-collections. This paper is a contribution to Sun Yet-sen University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - The Proterozoic geological records in eastern South China preserve a history linked to the Columbia and Rodinia supercontinent cycles and provide key constraints in understanding the geodynamic evolution of East Asia. However, it is uncertain if SW Hainan, Yangtze and Cathaysia were located in the interior or periphery of the Precambrian supercontinents, how they were connected prior to the formation of a united South China, whether the early Neoproterozoic Proto-Huanan subduction was long- or short-lived, and how and when Yangtze and Cathaysia were assembled along the Jiangnan Orogen. This paper provides an overview of key geological observations for the eastern Yangtze and Cathaysia with respect to Proterozoic tectonics. Our synthesis shows that the SW Hainan in the Mesoproterozoic (ca. 1.45 Ga) developed in a non-orogenic rift setting in the interior of Columbia. SW Hainan, together with SW Yangtze, drifted to the margin of Rodinia by ∼1.05 Ga. Furthermore, SW Hainan might have been part of the Mesoproterozoic Albany Fraser Orogen at ca. 1.30–1.05 Ga. Cathaysia and eastern Yangtze display distinct geological signatures in the early Neoproterozoic and Cathaysia remain separated from Yangtze until at least ca. 1.0 Ga. The ca. 1.0–0.9 Ga felsic igneous rocks in Cathaysia to the east of the Jiangshan-Shaoxing suture zone are mostly characterized by negative εHf(t) values, and distinct from those in the coeval Shuangxiwu arc to the west of the Jiangshan-Shaoxing suture zone, which have positive εHf(t) values. Igneous rocks dated at ca. 870–830 Ma (mainly ca. 850–830 Ma) are extensive in the Huaiyu and Jiangnan Orogen but poorly developed in Cathaysia. Neoproterozoic sedimentary rocks of Cathaysia contain abundant ca. 980 Ma detrital grains but only minor ca. 860–830 Ma grains. In contrast, in the Jiangnan and Huaiyu, the sedimentary rocks contain a dominant ca. 860–830 Ma detrital zircon age-peak but ca. 980 Ma grains are scare. Rift-related bi-model igneous rocks, ranging in age from ca. 810 Ma to ca. 750 Ma, represented by the Banxi, Likou and Mamianshan groups and their equivalents, are extensively developed in Cathaysia and Huaiyu, and the Jiangnan Orogen. These rift-related successions are separated from the Cangshuipu and Luojiamen conglomerates across an angular unconformity, which are in turn unconformable on the Lengjiaxi and Xikou groups. It is herein proposed that an early Neoproterozoic (ca. 1.0–0.9 Ga) accretionary orogen developed within the Cathaysia and lay along strike from the synchronous Eastern Ghats Orogen of India. A long-lived Neoproterozoic (ca. 0.97–0.83 Ga) Proto-Huanan arc-trench system resulted in the development of the ca. 0.98–0.88 Ga Shuangxiwu intra-oceanic arc, ca. 0.87–0.83 Huaiyu continental arc and ca. 0.87–0.83 Jiangnan intra-continental back- arc basin in response to the ongoing westward-subduction beneath the eastern Yangtze. At ca. 0.87 Ga, the arc-trench system switched from an intra-oceanic to a continental Andean margin setting. Such a system might be compatible to the NW India South Delhi Orogen at the periphery of Rodinia. Our synthesis shows that the united proto-South China was finally created by the ca. 830–810 Ma assemblage of the Yangtze with Cathaysia along the Jiangnan Orogen and was followed by the post-orogenic rifting due to the breakup of Rodinia.
AB - The Proterozoic geological records in eastern South China preserve a history linked to the Columbia and Rodinia supercontinent cycles and provide key constraints in understanding the geodynamic evolution of East Asia. However, it is uncertain if SW Hainan, Yangtze and Cathaysia were located in the interior or periphery of the Precambrian supercontinents, how they were connected prior to the formation of a united South China, whether the early Neoproterozoic Proto-Huanan subduction was long- or short-lived, and how and when Yangtze and Cathaysia were assembled along the Jiangnan Orogen. This paper provides an overview of key geological observations for the eastern Yangtze and Cathaysia with respect to Proterozoic tectonics. Our synthesis shows that the SW Hainan in the Mesoproterozoic (ca. 1.45 Ga) developed in a non-orogenic rift setting in the interior of Columbia. SW Hainan, together with SW Yangtze, drifted to the margin of Rodinia by ∼1.05 Ga. Furthermore, SW Hainan might have been part of the Mesoproterozoic Albany Fraser Orogen at ca. 1.30–1.05 Ga. Cathaysia and eastern Yangtze display distinct geological signatures in the early Neoproterozoic and Cathaysia remain separated from Yangtze until at least ca. 1.0 Ga. The ca. 1.0–0.9 Ga felsic igneous rocks in Cathaysia to the east of the Jiangshan-Shaoxing suture zone are mostly characterized by negative εHf(t) values, and distinct from those in the coeval Shuangxiwu arc to the west of the Jiangshan-Shaoxing suture zone, which have positive εHf(t) values. Igneous rocks dated at ca. 870–830 Ma (mainly ca. 850–830 Ma) are extensive in the Huaiyu and Jiangnan Orogen but poorly developed in Cathaysia. Neoproterozoic sedimentary rocks of Cathaysia contain abundant ca. 980 Ma detrital grains but only minor ca. 860–830 Ma grains. In contrast, in the Jiangnan and Huaiyu, the sedimentary rocks contain a dominant ca. 860–830 Ma detrital zircon age-peak but ca. 980 Ma grains are scare. Rift-related bi-model igneous rocks, ranging in age from ca. 810 Ma to ca. 750 Ma, represented by the Banxi, Likou and Mamianshan groups and their equivalents, are extensively developed in Cathaysia and Huaiyu, and the Jiangnan Orogen. These rift-related successions are separated from the Cangshuipu and Luojiamen conglomerates across an angular unconformity, which are in turn unconformable on the Lengjiaxi and Xikou groups. It is herein proposed that an early Neoproterozoic (ca. 1.0–0.9 Ga) accretionary orogen developed within the Cathaysia and lay along strike from the synchronous Eastern Ghats Orogen of India. A long-lived Neoproterozoic (ca. 0.97–0.83 Ga) Proto-Huanan arc-trench system resulted in the development of the ca. 0.98–0.88 Ga Shuangxiwu intra-oceanic arc, ca. 0.87–0.83 Huaiyu continental arc and ca. 0.87–0.83 Jiangnan intra-continental back- arc basin in response to the ongoing westward-subduction beneath the eastern Yangtze. At ca. 0.87 Ga, the arc-trench system switched from an intra-oceanic to a continental Andean margin setting. Such a system might be compatible to the NW India South Delhi Orogen at the periphery of Rodinia. Our synthesis shows that the united proto-South China was finally created by the ca. 830–810 Ma assemblage of the Yangtze with Cathaysia along the Jiangnan Orogen and was followed by the post-orogenic rifting due to the breakup of Rodinia.
KW - Assemblage of the Yangtze with Cathaysia
KW - From Columbia interior to Rodinia periphery
KW - Long-lived early Neoproterozoic Proto-Huanan subduction
KW - Proterozoic geological observation
KW - United proto-South China
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180565200&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104652
DO - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104652
M3 - Review Article
AN - SCOPUS:85180565200
SN - 0012-8252
VL - 249
JO - Earth-Science Reviews
JF - Earth-Science Reviews
M1 - 104652
ER -