Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Protein structure and functional differentiation between high-amylose and wild-type wheat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

High-amylose wheat, developed using non-transgenic methods, has gained considerable attention due to its high intrinsic resistant starch, which provides notable health benefits. However, there is still limited understanding of high-amylose wheat from a protein perspective. In this study, proteins from a wild-type (durum wheat AM01, 24 % amylose content, bread wheat RS01, 23 % amylose content) and its high-amylose counterpart (durum wheat AM02, 59% amylose content, bread wheat RS126, 62% amylose content) were comparatively evaluated across multiple structural levels. Although the crude protein content in high-amylose wheat increased by 4–5%, the SDS-PAGE profile of soluble protein remained similar to that of wild-type wheat. However, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) analysis revealed that high-amylose wheat exhibited a higher proportion of β-sheets and a lower proportion of α-helices in its secondary protein structure. This structural shift suggests that increased amylose content may alter the protein matrix, enhancing interactions between protein molecules while reducing the ability to form hydrogen bonds. The protein molecular size distribution was altered in durum wheat but remained consistent in bread wheat. Additionally, high-amylose wheat demonstrated an enhanced water-binding capacity. The dough made from high-amylose wheat exhibited improved elasticity and resistance to deformation. These findings provide new insights into how high-amylose wheat protein structure influences dough properties, offering opportunities for optimizing wheat-based ingredients and processing.

Original languageEnglish
Article number111075
Number of pages10
JournalFood Hydrocolloids
Volume163
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • Creep-recovery test of dough
  • High-amylose wheat flour
  • Intermolecular forces
  • Protein molecular size
  • Protein secondary structure
  • Water-binding capacity

Cite this