TY - JOUR
T1 - Prophylactic levosimendan in patients with low ejection fraction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
T2 - A pooled analysis of two multicentre randomised controlled trials
AU - Caruba, Thibaut
AU - Charles-Nelson, Anaïs
AU - Alexander, John H.
AU - Mehta, Rajendra H.
AU - Heringlake, Matthias
AU - Toller, Wolfgang
AU - Yavchitz, Amelie
AU - Sabatier, Brigitte
AU - Chatellier, Gilles
AU - Cholley, Bernard
N1 - Funding Information:
Assistance with the article: The authors thank Mr. Jeffrey Leimberger for his expert assistance with the LEVO-CTS database, as well as Dr. Joachim Erb, Mrs. Kathrin Scholtz, Prof. Claudia Spies, and Dr. Polychronis Antonitsis for providing details of their mortality data that were not available in their original publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar)
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Objectives: To assess the effect of preoperative levosimendan on mortality at day 90 in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, and to investigate a possible differential effect between patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus CABG combined with valve replacement surgery. Design: Pooled analysis of two multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCT) investigating prophylactic levosimendan versus placebo prior to CABG surgery on mortality at day 90 in patients with LVEF ≤ 40%. A meta-analysis of all RCT investigating the same issue was also conducted. Results: A cohort of 1084 patients (809 isolated CABG, and 275 combined surgery) resulted from the merging of LEVO-CTS and LICORN databases. Seventy-two patients were dead at day 90. The mortality at day 90 was not different between levosimendan and placebo (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.73, 95% CI: 0.41–1.28, p = 0.27). However, there was a significant interaction between the type of surgery and the study drug (p = 0.004). We observed a decrease in mortality at day 90 in the isolated CABG subgroup (HR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19–0.82, p = 0.013), but not in the combined surgery subgroup (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.77–3.92, p = 0.19). The meta-analysis of 6 RCT involving 1441 patients confirmed the differential effect on mortality at day 30 between the 2 subgroups. Conclusions: Preoperative levosimendan did not reduce mortality in a mixed surgical population with LV dysfunction. However, the subgroup of patients undergoing isolated CABG had a reduction in mortality at day 90, whereas there was no significant effect in combined surgery patients. This finding requires confirmation with a specific prospective trial.
AB - Objectives: To assess the effect of preoperative levosimendan on mortality at day 90 in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, and to investigate a possible differential effect between patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus CABG combined with valve replacement surgery. Design: Pooled analysis of two multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCT) investigating prophylactic levosimendan versus placebo prior to CABG surgery on mortality at day 90 in patients with LVEF ≤ 40%. A meta-analysis of all RCT investigating the same issue was also conducted. Results: A cohort of 1084 patients (809 isolated CABG, and 275 combined surgery) resulted from the merging of LEVO-CTS and LICORN databases. Seventy-two patients were dead at day 90. The mortality at day 90 was not different between levosimendan and placebo (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.73, 95% CI: 0.41–1.28, p = 0.27). However, there was a significant interaction between the type of surgery and the study drug (p = 0.004). We observed a decrease in mortality at day 90 in the isolated CABG subgroup (HR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19–0.82, p = 0.013), but not in the combined surgery subgroup (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.77–3.92, p = 0.19). The meta-analysis of 6 RCT involving 1441 patients confirmed the differential effect on mortality at day 30 between the 2 subgroups. Conclusions: Preoperative levosimendan did not reduce mortality in a mixed surgical population with LV dysfunction. However, the subgroup of patients undergoing isolated CABG had a reduction in mortality at day 90, whereas there was no significant effect in combined surgery patients. This finding requires confirmation with a specific prospective trial.
KW - Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)
KW - Levosimendan
KW - Mortality
KW - Valve replacement surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133183960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101107
DO - 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101107
M3 - Article
C2 - 35643391
AN - SCOPUS:85133183960
VL - 41
JO - Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine
JF - Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine
SN - 2352-5568
IS - 4
M1 - 101107
ER -