Prognosis-based management of unexplained infertility-why not?

Laxmi Shingshetty, Rui Wang, Qian Feng, Abha Maheshwari, Ben W. Mol

Research output: Contribution to journalComment / DebateOtherpeer-review

Abstract

Up to a half of couples seeking medical assistance for infertility are diagnosed with unexplained infertility, characterized by normal ovulation, tubal patency, and semen analysis results. This condition presents a challenge in determining the optimal treatment approach. Available treatments include IUI and IVF, but guidelines vary on when to offer each. Prognosis-based management is identified as a research priority, and various prediction models have been developed to guide treatment decisions. Prognostic factors include female age, duration of subfertility, and sperm parameters, among others. Prognosis-based strategies can enhance cost-effectiveness, safety, and patient outcomes, offering less invasive options to those with good prognoses and more aggressive interventions to those with poor prognoses. However, there is a gap between research evidence and its clinical application. In this article, we discuss the application of prognosis-based management in the context of unexplained infertility, highlighting its potential to improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberhoae015
Number of pages7
JournalHuman Reproduction Open
Volume2024
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Keywords

  • expectant management
  • in vitro fertilization
  • intra-uterine insemination
  • live birth
  • prediction models
  • prognostic models
  • unexplained infertility

Cite this