Abstract
Denunciation and general deterrence are major objectives of sentencing those who are convicted of possessing or distributing child exploitation material in Australia (CEM offenders), but courts also strive to achieve specific deterrence. To this end, courts tend to rely on professional reports as evidence of risk of reoffending and prospects for rehabilitation. After outlining matters that courts consider when sentencing CEM offenders, we discuss key empirical findings concerning CEM offenders’ risk of recidivism, and then evaluate two approaches for assessing this risk: actuarial assessments; and structured professional judgment. We recommend that professional reports prepared for sentencing reflect current research findings regarding risk of recidivism amongst CEM offenders and that the structured professional judgment approach is used. We also recommend that matters which inform offenders’ risk of recidivism and their prospects for rehabilitation be reported separately.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 868-885 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Nov 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- actuarial
- child exploitation material
- child pornography
- rehabilitation
- risk assessment
- structured professional judgment
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver