Productivity Commission Draft Report of Public Infrastructure

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned ReportResearch

Abstract

I found the draft Report refreshing in its balance and objectivity and wish to firstly convey my congratulations to those who drafted it. In my experience, the public policy domain around the provision of public infrastructure is these days filled with as much ideological and conflicted advice as sensible guidance. I wholeheartedly agree with your judgment that our ‘inadequate project selection’methods need an overhaul, along with reforms encouraging better decision making. I also endorse your comment that private financing is ‘not a magic pudding’ and that neither government guarantees nor tax concessions are costless. And whilst I do not personally agree with your conclusion that ‘well designed user charges should be used to the fullest extent’ (unless of course governments are given a specific mandate at an election for this) or that ‘the market appears to be workably competitive’ (the basis of which is not clear to me), these are perhaps small issues in the bigger scheme of infrastructure matters with which this report deals well.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherMonash University
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

@book{78c55b196a454991bb9bcd211679d917,
title = "Productivity Commission Draft Report of Public Infrastructure",
abstract = "I found the draft Report refreshing in its balance and objectivity and wish to firstly convey my congratulations to those who drafted it. In my experience, the public policy domain around the provision of public infrastructure is these days filled with as much ideological and conflicted advice as sensible guidance. I wholeheartedly agree with your judgment that our ‘inadequate project selection’methods need an overhaul, along with reforms encouraging better decision making. I also endorse your comment that private financing is ‘not a magic pudding’ and that neither government guarantees nor tax concessions are costless. And whilst I do not personally agree with your conclusion that ‘well designed user charges should be used to the fullest extent’ (unless of course governments are given a specific mandate at an election for this) or that ‘the market appears to be workably competitive’ (the basis of which is not clear to me), these are perhaps small issues in the bigger scheme of infrastructure matters with which this report deals well.",
author = "Graeme Hodge",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
publisher = "Monash University",

}

Productivity Commission Draft Report of Public Infrastructure. / Hodge, Graeme.

Monash University, 2014. 8 p.

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned ReportResearch

TY - BOOK

T1 - Productivity Commission Draft Report of Public Infrastructure

AU - Hodge, Graeme

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - I found the draft Report refreshing in its balance and objectivity and wish to firstly convey my congratulations to those who drafted it. In my experience, the public policy domain around the provision of public infrastructure is these days filled with as much ideological and conflicted advice as sensible guidance. I wholeheartedly agree with your judgment that our ‘inadequate project selection’methods need an overhaul, along with reforms encouraging better decision making. I also endorse your comment that private financing is ‘not a magic pudding’ and that neither government guarantees nor tax concessions are costless. And whilst I do not personally agree with your conclusion that ‘well designed user charges should be used to the fullest extent’ (unless of course governments are given a specific mandate at an election for this) or that ‘the market appears to be workably competitive’ (the basis of which is not clear to me), these are perhaps small issues in the bigger scheme of infrastructure matters with which this report deals well.

AB - I found the draft Report refreshing in its balance and objectivity and wish to firstly convey my congratulations to those who drafted it. In my experience, the public policy domain around the provision of public infrastructure is these days filled with as much ideological and conflicted advice as sensible guidance. I wholeheartedly agree with your judgment that our ‘inadequate project selection’methods need an overhaul, along with reforms encouraging better decision making. I also endorse your comment that private financing is ‘not a magic pudding’ and that neither government guarantees nor tax concessions are costless. And whilst I do not personally agree with your conclusion that ‘well designed user charges should be used to the fullest extent’ (unless of course governments are given a specific mandate at an election for this) or that ‘the market appears to be workably competitive’ (the basis of which is not clear to me), these are perhaps small issues in the bigger scheme of infrastructure matters with which this report deals well.

M3 - Commissioned Report

BT - Productivity Commission Draft Report of Public Infrastructure

PB - Monash University

ER -