Production weighted water use impact characterisation factors for the global mining industry

Stephen A. Northey, Cristina Madrid López, Nawshad Haque, Gavin M. Mudd, Mohan Yellishetty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Methods for quantifying the impacts of water use within life cycle assessment have developed significantly over the past decade. These methods account for local differences in hydrology and water use contexts through the use of regionally specific impact characterisation factors. However, few studies have applied these methods to the mining industry and so there is limited understanding regarding how spatial boundaries may affect assessments of the mining industry's consumptive water use impacts. To address this, we developed production weighted characterisation factors for 25 mineral and metal commodities based upon the spatial distribution of global mine production across watersheds and nations. Our results indicate that impact characterisation using the national average ‘Water Stress Index’ (WSI) would overestimate the water use impacts for 67% of mining operations when compared to assessments using watershed WSI values. Comparatively, national average ‘Available Water Remaining’ (AWaRe) factors would overestimate impacts for 60% of mining operations compared to assessments using watershed factors. In the absence of watershed scale inventory data, assessments may benefit from developing alternative characterisation factors reflecting the spatial distribution of commodity production across watersheds. The results also provide an indication of the commodities being mined in highly water stressed or scarce regions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)788-797
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume184
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 May 2018

Keywords

  • Available water remaining
  • Impact characterisation
  • Life cycle assessment (LCA)
  • Mineral and metal production
  • Mining industry
  • Water stress index (WSI)

Cite this

Northey, Stephen A. ; Madrid López, Cristina ; Haque, Nawshad ; Mudd, Gavin M. ; Yellishetty, Mohan. / Production weighted water use impact characterisation factors for the global mining industry. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018 ; Vol. 184. pp. 788-797.
@article{2e33b355bebc40fb933dc66e78f986d2,
title = "Production weighted water use impact characterisation factors for the global mining industry",
abstract = "Methods for quantifying the impacts of water use within life cycle assessment have developed significantly over the past decade. These methods account for local differences in hydrology and water use contexts through the use of regionally specific impact characterisation factors. However, few studies have applied these methods to the mining industry and so there is limited understanding regarding how spatial boundaries may affect assessments of the mining industry's consumptive water use impacts. To address this, we developed production weighted characterisation factors for 25 mineral and metal commodities based upon the spatial distribution of global mine production across watersheds and nations. Our results indicate that impact characterisation using the national average ‘Water Stress Index’ (WSI) would overestimate the water use impacts for 67{\%} of mining operations when compared to assessments using watershed WSI values. Comparatively, national average ‘Available Water Remaining’ (AWaRe) factors would overestimate impacts for 60{\%} of mining operations compared to assessments using watershed factors. In the absence of watershed scale inventory data, assessments may benefit from developing alternative characterisation factors reflecting the spatial distribution of commodity production across watersheds. The results also provide an indication of the commodities being mined in highly water stressed or scarce regions.",
keywords = "Available water remaining, Impact characterisation, Life cycle assessment (LCA), Mineral and metal production, Mining industry, Water stress index (WSI)",
author = "Northey, {Stephen A.} and {Madrid L{\'o}pez}, Cristina and Nawshad Haque and Mudd, {Gavin M.} and Mohan Yellishetty",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.307",
language = "English",
volume = "184",
pages = "788--797",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Production weighted water use impact characterisation factors for the global mining industry. / Northey, Stephen A.; Madrid López, Cristina; Haque, Nawshad; Mudd, Gavin M.; Yellishetty, Mohan.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 184, 20.05.2018, p. 788-797.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Production weighted water use impact characterisation factors for the global mining industry

AU - Northey, Stephen A.

AU - Madrid López, Cristina

AU - Haque, Nawshad

AU - Mudd, Gavin M.

AU - Yellishetty, Mohan

PY - 2018/5/20

Y1 - 2018/5/20

N2 - Methods for quantifying the impacts of water use within life cycle assessment have developed significantly over the past decade. These methods account for local differences in hydrology and water use contexts through the use of regionally specific impact characterisation factors. However, few studies have applied these methods to the mining industry and so there is limited understanding regarding how spatial boundaries may affect assessments of the mining industry's consumptive water use impacts. To address this, we developed production weighted characterisation factors for 25 mineral and metal commodities based upon the spatial distribution of global mine production across watersheds and nations. Our results indicate that impact characterisation using the national average ‘Water Stress Index’ (WSI) would overestimate the water use impacts for 67% of mining operations when compared to assessments using watershed WSI values. Comparatively, national average ‘Available Water Remaining’ (AWaRe) factors would overestimate impacts for 60% of mining operations compared to assessments using watershed factors. In the absence of watershed scale inventory data, assessments may benefit from developing alternative characterisation factors reflecting the spatial distribution of commodity production across watersheds. The results also provide an indication of the commodities being mined in highly water stressed or scarce regions.

AB - Methods for quantifying the impacts of water use within life cycle assessment have developed significantly over the past decade. These methods account for local differences in hydrology and water use contexts through the use of regionally specific impact characterisation factors. However, few studies have applied these methods to the mining industry and so there is limited understanding regarding how spatial boundaries may affect assessments of the mining industry's consumptive water use impacts. To address this, we developed production weighted characterisation factors for 25 mineral and metal commodities based upon the spatial distribution of global mine production across watersheds and nations. Our results indicate that impact characterisation using the national average ‘Water Stress Index’ (WSI) would overestimate the water use impacts for 67% of mining operations when compared to assessments using watershed WSI values. Comparatively, national average ‘Available Water Remaining’ (AWaRe) factors would overestimate impacts for 60% of mining operations compared to assessments using watershed factors. In the absence of watershed scale inventory data, assessments may benefit from developing alternative characterisation factors reflecting the spatial distribution of commodity production across watersheds. The results also provide an indication of the commodities being mined in highly water stressed or scarce regions.

KW - Available water remaining

KW - Impact characterisation

KW - Life cycle assessment (LCA)

KW - Mineral and metal production

KW - Mining industry

KW - Water stress index (WSI)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046038962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.307

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.307

M3 - Article

VL - 184

SP - 788

EP - 797

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -