Procurement sustainability tensions

an integrative perspective

Sajad Fayezi, Maryam Zomorrodi, Lydia Bals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to unpack tensions faced by procurement professionals as part of their triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability activities. The authors take an integrative perspective based on the procurement sustainability and organizational tensions literature, as well as stakeholder and institutional theory. Design/methodology/approach: The authors use a multiple case study approach. Data are collected through multiple interviews and archival data from eight case companies in Australia. Findings: The authors identify supply chain and company procurement sustainability tensions (PSTs) and explain their multi-level nature. The analysis also dissects the multi-stakeholder and multi-institutional environments where PSTs operate. The authors discuss such environments in terms of various temporal and spatial legitimacy contexts (LCs) that, through their assessment of institutional distance, can characterize the manifestation of PSTs. Practical implications: The findings are instrumental for managers to make informed decisions when dealing with PSTs, and they pave the way for paradoxical leadership given the increasing importance of simultaneous development and balancing of TBL dimensions, as evidenced in this study. Originality/value: This is one of the first studies to empirically investigate PSTs by drawing on an integrative approach to identify PSTs, and to discern various LCs that underpin stakeholder judgments of procurement’s TBL sustainability activities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)586-609
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Case study
  • Institutional theory
  • Organizational tensions
  • Procurement sustainability
  • Procurement sustainability tensions
  • Stakeholder theory

Cite this

Fayezi, Sajad ; Zomorrodi, Maryam ; Bals, Lydia. / Procurement sustainability tensions : an integrative perspective. In: International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. 2018 ; Vol. 48, No. 6. pp. 586-609.
@article{19b95d1d131a40198dc7e17d5d416eda,
title = "Procurement sustainability tensions: an integrative perspective",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to unpack tensions faced by procurement professionals as part of their triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability activities. The authors take an integrative perspective based on the procurement sustainability and organizational tensions literature, as well as stakeholder and institutional theory. Design/methodology/approach: The authors use a multiple case study approach. Data are collected through multiple interviews and archival data from eight case companies in Australia. Findings: The authors identify supply chain and company procurement sustainability tensions (PSTs) and explain their multi-level nature. The analysis also dissects the multi-stakeholder and multi-institutional environments where PSTs operate. The authors discuss such environments in terms of various temporal and spatial legitimacy contexts (LCs) that, through their assessment of institutional distance, can characterize the manifestation of PSTs. Practical implications: The findings are instrumental for managers to make informed decisions when dealing with PSTs, and they pave the way for paradoxical leadership given the increasing importance of simultaneous development and balancing of TBL dimensions, as evidenced in this study. Originality/value: This is one of the first studies to empirically investigate PSTs by drawing on an integrative approach to identify PSTs, and to discern various LCs that underpin stakeholder judgments of procurement’s TBL sustainability activities.",
keywords = "Case study, Institutional theory, Organizational tensions, Procurement sustainability, Procurement sustainability tensions, Stakeholder theory",
author = "Sajad Fayezi and Maryam Zomorrodi and Lydia Bals",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0013",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "586--609",
journal = "International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management",
issn = "0960-0035",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "6",

}

Procurement sustainability tensions : an integrative perspective. / Fayezi, Sajad; Zomorrodi, Maryam; Bals, Lydia.

In: International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2018, p. 586-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procurement sustainability tensions

T2 - an integrative perspective

AU - Fayezi, Sajad

AU - Zomorrodi, Maryam

AU - Bals, Lydia

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to unpack tensions faced by procurement professionals as part of their triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability activities. The authors take an integrative perspective based on the procurement sustainability and organizational tensions literature, as well as stakeholder and institutional theory. Design/methodology/approach: The authors use a multiple case study approach. Data are collected through multiple interviews and archival data from eight case companies in Australia. Findings: The authors identify supply chain and company procurement sustainability tensions (PSTs) and explain their multi-level nature. The analysis also dissects the multi-stakeholder and multi-institutional environments where PSTs operate. The authors discuss such environments in terms of various temporal and spatial legitimacy contexts (LCs) that, through their assessment of institutional distance, can characterize the manifestation of PSTs. Practical implications: The findings are instrumental for managers to make informed decisions when dealing with PSTs, and they pave the way for paradoxical leadership given the increasing importance of simultaneous development and balancing of TBL dimensions, as evidenced in this study. Originality/value: This is one of the first studies to empirically investigate PSTs by drawing on an integrative approach to identify PSTs, and to discern various LCs that underpin stakeholder judgments of procurement’s TBL sustainability activities.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to unpack tensions faced by procurement professionals as part of their triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability activities. The authors take an integrative perspective based on the procurement sustainability and organizational tensions literature, as well as stakeholder and institutional theory. Design/methodology/approach: The authors use a multiple case study approach. Data are collected through multiple interviews and archival data from eight case companies in Australia. Findings: The authors identify supply chain and company procurement sustainability tensions (PSTs) and explain their multi-level nature. The analysis also dissects the multi-stakeholder and multi-institutional environments where PSTs operate. The authors discuss such environments in terms of various temporal and spatial legitimacy contexts (LCs) that, through their assessment of institutional distance, can characterize the manifestation of PSTs. Practical implications: The findings are instrumental for managers to make informed decisions when dealing with PSTs, and they pave the way for paradoxical leadership given the increasing importance of simultaneous development and balancing of TBL dimensions, as evidenced in this study. Originality/value: This is one of the first studies to empirically investigate PSTs by drawing on an integrative approach to identify PSTs, and to discern various LCs that underpin stakeholder judgments of procurement’s TBL sustainability activities.

KW - Case study

KW - Institutional theory

KW - Organizational tensions

KW - Procurement sustainability

KW - Procurement sustainability tensions

KW - Stakeholder theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045422144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0013

DO - 10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0013

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 586

EP - 609

JO - International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management

JF - International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management

SN - 0960-0035

IS - 6

ER -