TY - JOUR
T1 - Process evaluation of the simplification of medications prescribed to long‐term care residents (Simpler) cluster randomized controlled trial
T2 - A mixed methods study
AU - Sluggett, Janet K.
AU - Hughes, Georgina A.
AU - Ooi, Choon Ean
AU - Chen, Esa Y.H.
AU - Corlis, Megan
AU - Hogan, Michelle E.
AU - Caporale, Tessa
AU - Van Emden, Jan
AU - Simon Bell, J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Partnership Centre on Dealing with Cognitive and Related Functional Decline in Older People (Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre or CDPC) (grant number GNT9100000). The CDPC receives support from the NHMRC and funding partners including Helping Hand Aged Care, HammondCare, Brightwater and Dementia Australia. The contents of the published materials are solely the responsibility of the individual authors identified, and do not reflect the views of the NHMRC and any other Funding Bodies or the Funding Partners. JKS is supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (grant number APP1156439). JSB is supported by an NHMRC Boosting Dementia Research Leadership Scheme Fellowship (grant number APP1140298). EYHC was sup‐ ported by a postgraduate research scholarship funded by the CDPC and the Monash University Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. GAH was supported by a Monash University Summer Vacation Research Scholarship funded by the CDPC and the Monash University Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Funding Information:
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that this study was funded through the NHMRC CDPC. The aged care provider organization involved in this research was one of the CDPC funding part‐ ners. TC, MH, MC and JVE were employed by the aged care provider organization that participated in the SIMPLER study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Complex medication regimens are highly prevalent, burdensome for residents and staff, and associated with poor health outcomes in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). The SIMPLER study was a non‐blinded, matched‐pair, cluster randomized controlled trial in eight Australian RACFs that investigated the one‐off application of a structured 5‐step implicit process to simplify medication regimens. The aim of this study was to explore the processes underpinning study implementation and uptake of the medication simplification intervention. A mixed methods process evaluation with an explanatory design was undertaken in parallel with the main outcome evaluation of the SIMPLER study and was guided by an established 8‐domain framework. The qualitative component included a document analysis and semi‐structured interviews with 25 stakeholders (residents, family, research nurses, pharmacists, RACF staff, and a general medical practitioner). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and reflexively thematically content analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize quantitative data extracted from key research documents. The SIM‐ PLER recruitment rates at the eight RACFs ranged from 18.9% to 48.6% of eligible residents (38.4% overall). Participation decisions were influenced by altruism, opinions of trusted persons, willingness to change a medication regimen, and third‐party hesitation regarding potential resident distress. Intervention delivery was generally consistent with the study protocol. Stakeholders perceived regimen simplification was beneficial and low risk if the simplification recommendations were individualized. Implementation of the simplification recommendations varied between the four intervention RACFs, with simplification implemented at 4‐month follow‐up for between 25% and 86% of residents for whom simplification was possible. Good working relationships between stakeholders and new remunerated models of medication management were perceived facilitators to wider implementation. In conclusion, the one‐off implicit medication simplification intervention was feasible and generally delivered according to the protocol to a representative sample of residents. Despite variable implementation, recommendations to simplify complex regimens were valued by stakeholders, who also supported wider implementation of medication simplification in RACFs.
AB - Complex medication regimens are highly prevalent, burdensome for residents and staff, and associated with poor health outcomes in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). The SIMPLER study was a non‐blinded, matched‐pair, cluster randomized controlled trial in eight Australian RACFs that investigated the one‐off application of a structured 5‐step implicit process to simplify medication regimens. The aim of this study was to explore the processes underpinning study implementation and uptake of the medication simplification intervention. A mixed methods process evaluation with an explanatory design was undertaken in parallel with the main outcome evaluation of the SIMPLER study and was guided by an established 8‐domain framework. The qualitative component included a document analysis and semi‐structured interviews with 25 stakeholders (residents, family, research nurses, pharmacists, RACF staff, and a general medical practitioner). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and reflexively thematically content analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize quantitative data extracted from key research documents. The SIM‐ PLER recruitment rates at the eight RACFs ranged from 18.9% to 48.6% of eligible residents (38.4% overall). Participation decisions were influenced by altruism, opinions of trusted persons, willingness to change a medication regimen, and third‐party hesitation regarding potential resident distress. Intervention delivery was generally consistent with the study protocol. Stakeholders perceived regimen simplification was beneficial and low risk if the simplification recommendations were individualized. Implementation of the simplification recommendations varied between the four intervention RACFs, with simplification implemented at 4‐month follow‐up for between 25% and 86% of residents for whom simplification was possible. Good working relationships between stakeholders and new remunerated models of medication management were perceived facilitators to wider implementation. In conclusion, the one‐off implicit medication simplification intervention was feasible and generally delivered according to the protocol to a representative sample of residents. Despite variable implementation, recommendations to simplify complex regimens were valued by stakeholders, who also supported wider implementation of medication simplification in RACFs.
KW - Aged
KW - Australia
KW - Health care
KW - Long‐term care
KW - Medication administration
KW - Medication systems
KW - Medication therapy management
KW - Nursing homes
KW - Process assessment
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Randomized controlled trial
KW - Residential facilities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106630296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph18115778
DO - 10.3390/ijerph18115778
M3 - Article
C2 - 34072223
AN - SCOPUS:85106630296
VL - 18
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
SN - 1661-7827
IS - 11
M1 - 5778
ER -