Problems, perceptions and actions: An interdependent process for generating informal social control

John R. Hipp, Rebecca Leigh Wickes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Using two waves of survey data for residents in neighborhoods in Brisbane, this study explores the interdependent relationship between residents' perceptions of neighboring, cohesion, collective efficacy, neighborhood disorder, and the actions they take to address these problems. Our longitudinal results show that residents’ perceived severity of a problem helps explain engaging in activity to address the problem. People loitering appeared to be the most galvanizing problem for residents, but had particularly deleterious effects on perceptions of cohesion and collective efficacy. We also find that residents who perceive more neighboring in their local area engage in more public and parochial social control activity and residents who live in collectively efficacious neighborhoods are more likely to engage in parochial social control action. Furthermore, residents who themselves perceive more collective efficacy in the neighborhood engage in more parochial or public social control during the subsequent time period. Importantly, we find strong evidence that residents update their sense of collective efficacy. Perceiving more problems in the neighborhood, and perceiving that these problems are increasing, reduced perceptions of neighboring and collective efficacy over time.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-125
Number of pages19
JournalSocial Science Research
Volume73
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Apr 2018

Keywords

  • Neighborhoods; Collective efficacy; Networks; Disorder; Action

Cite this

@article{4c8bba15c6e4463f88c87c61be6d56a1,
title = "Problems, perceptions and actions: An interdependent process for generating informal social control",
abstract = "Using two waves of survey data for residents in neighborhoods in Brisbane, this study explores the interdependent relationship between residents' perceptions of neighboring, cohesion, collective efficacy, neighborhood disorder, and the actions they take to address these problems. Our longitudinal results show that residents’ perceived severity of a problem helps explain engaging in activity to address the problem. People loitering appeared to be the most galvanizing problem for residents, but had particularly deleterious effects on perceptions of cohesion and collective efficacy. We also find that residents who perceive more neighboring in their local area engage in more public and parochial social control activity and residents who live in collectively efficacious neighborhoods are more likely to engage in parochial social control action. Furthermore, residents who themselves perceive more collective efficacy in the neighborhood engage in more parochial or public social control during the subsequent time period. Importantly, we find strong evidence that residents update their sense of collective efficacy. Perceiving more problems in the neighborhood, and perceiving that these problems are increasing, reduced perceptions of neighboring and collective efficacy over time.",
keywords = "Neighborhoods; Collective efficacy; Networks; Disorder; Action",
author = "Hipp, {John R.} and Wickes, {Rebecca Leigh}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.03.015",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "107--125",
journal = "Social Science Research",
issn = "0049-089X",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

Problems, perceptions and actions : An interdependent process for generating informal social control. / Hipp, John R.; Wickes, Rebecca Leigh.

In: Social Science Research, Vol. 73, 05.04.2018, p. 107-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Problems, perceptions and actions

T2 - An interdependent process for generating informal social control

AU - Hipp, John R.

AU - Wickes, Rebecca Leigh

PY - 2018/4/5

Y1 - 2018/4/5

N2 - Using two waves of survey data for residents in neighborhoods in Brisbane, this study explores the interdependent relationship between residents' perceptions of neighboring, cohesion, collective efficacy, neighborhood disorder, and the actions they take to address these problems. Our longitudinal results show that residents’ perceived severity of a problem helps explain engaging in activity to address the problem. People loitering appeared to be the most galvanizing problem for residents, but had particularly deleterious effects on perceptions of cohesion and collective efficacy. We also find that residents who perceive more neighboring in their local area engage in more public and parochial social control activity and residents who live in collectively efficacious neighborhoods are more likely to engage in parochial social control action. Furthermore, residents who themselves perceive more collective efficacy in the neighborhood engage in more parochial or public social control during the subsequent time period. Importantly, we find strong evidence that residents update their sense of collective efficacy. Perceiving more problems in the neighborhood, and perceiving that these problems are increasing, reduced perceptions of neighboring and collective efficacy over time.

AB - Using two waves of survey data for residents in neighborhoods in Brisbane, this study explores the interdependent relationship between residents' perceptions of neighboring, cohesion, collective efficacy, neighborhood disorder, and the actions they take to address these problems. Our longitudinal results show that residents’ perceived severity of a problem helps explain engaging in activity to address the problem. People loitering appeared to be the most galvanizing problem for residents, but had particularly deleterious effects on perceptions of cohesion and collective efficacy. We also find that residents who perceive more neighboring in their local area engage in more public and parochial social control activity and residents who live in collectively efficacious neighborhoods are more likely to engage in parochial social control action. Furthermore, residents who themselves perceive more collective efficacy in the neighborhood engage in more parochial or public social control during the subsequent time period. Importantly, we find strong evidence that residents update their sense of collective efficacy. Perceiving more problems in the neighborhood, and perceiving that these problems are increasing, reduced perceptions of neighboring and collective efficacy over time.

KW - Neighborhoods; Collective efficacy; Networks; Disorder; Action

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046115352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.03.015

DO - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.03.015

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 107

EP - 125

JO - Social Science Research

JF - Social Science Research

SN - 0049-089X

ER -