Privacy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEncyclopaedia / Dictionary EntryOtherpeer-review

Abstract

There have been extended efforts to define “privacy” within political thought and the social sciences as well as within the context of legal disputes in the courts. In political theory, the public/private divide is associated mostly with the liberal tradition, in which privacy is linked to a private sphere that designates an area of life in which an individual can tell both the state and others that access to his body or information about him, including his correspondence, is “none of their business.” This has historically been gendered and associated with private property ownership, which gives the right to exclude others from a particular place, in particular the family home. In common law countries wives did not have the right to refuse their husbands access to their bodies until late into the twentieth century. For example, in the UK this marital exception to the rape laws persisted until a famous case in 1992. This last remnant of the doctrine of coverture persisted beyond other relationships that were defined by status.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Encyclopedia of Political Thought
PublisherWiley-Blackwell
Pages1-10
Number of pages10
Volume8
ISBN (Electronic)9781118474396
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • dignity
  • feminism
  • freedom
  • human rights
  • information society
  • Internet

Cite this

Richardson, J. (2014). Privacy. In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought (Vol. 8, pp. 1-10). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0829
Richardson, Janice. / Privacy. The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Vol. 8 Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. pp. 1-10
@inbook{43a2c7ebe0964769b79d8832d9a54d85,
title = "Privacy",
abstract = "There have been extended efforts to define “privacy” within political thought and the social sciences as well as within the context of legal disputes in the courts. In political theory, the public/private divide is associated mostly with the liberal tradition, in which privacy is linked to a private sphere that designates an area of life in which an individual can tell both the state and others that access to his body or information about him, including his correspondence, is “none of their business.” This has historically been gendered and associated with private property ownership, which gives the right to exclude others from a particular place, in particular the family home. In common law countries wives did not have the right to refuse their husbands access to their bodies until late into the twentieth century. For example, in the UK this marital exception to the rape laws persisted until a famous case in 1992. This last remnant of the doctrine of coverture persisted beyond other relationships that were defined by status.",
keywords = "dignity, feminism, freedom, human rights, information society, Internet",
author = "Janice Richardson",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0829",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--10",
booktitle = "The Encyclopedia of Political Thought",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
address = "Australia",

}

Richardson, J 2014, Privacy. in The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. vol. 8, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0829

Privacy. / Richardson, Janice.

The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Vol. 8 Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. p. 1-10.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEncyclopaedia / Dictionary EntryOtherpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Privacy

AU - Richardson, Janice

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - There have been extended efforts to define “privacy” within political thought and the social sciences as well as within the context of legal disputes in the courts. In political theory, the public/private divide is associated mostly with the liberal tradition, in which privacy is linked to a private sphere that designates an area of life in which an individual can tell both the state and others that access to his body or information about him, including his correspondence, is “none of their business.” This has historically been gendered and associated with private property ownership, which gives the right to exclude others from a particular place, in particular the family home. In common law countries wives did not have the right to refuse their husbands access to their bodies until late into the twentieth century. For example, in the UK this marital exception to the rape laws persisted until a famous case in 1992. This last remnant of the doctrine of coverture persisted beyond other relationships that were defined by status.

AB - There have been extended efforts to define “privacy” within political thought and the social sciences as well as within the context of legal disputes in the courts. In political theory, the public/private divide is associated mostly with the liberal tradition, in which privacy is linked to a private sphere that designates an area of life in which an individual can tell both the state and others that access to his body or information about him, including his correspondence, is “none of their business.” This has historically been gendered and associated with private property ownership, which gives the right to exclude others from a particular place, in particular the family home. In common law countries wives did not have the right to refuse their husbands access to their bodies until late into the twentieth century. For example, in the UK this marital exception to the rape laws persisted until a famous case in 1992. This last remnant of the doctrine of coverture persisted beyond other relationships that were defined by status.

KW - dignity

KW - feminism

KW - freedom

KW - human rights

KW - information society

KW - Internet

U2 - 10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0829

DO - 10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0829

M3 - Encyclopaedia / Dictionary Entry

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 10

BT - The Encyclopedia of Political Thought

PB - Wiley-Blackwell

ER -

Richardson J. Privacy. In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Vol. 8. Wiley-Blackwell. 2014. p. 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0829