Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion

Melodie McGeoch, Piero Genovesi, Peter J Bellingham, Mark John Costello, Christopher Mark McGrannachan, Andy Sheppard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Prioritization is indispensable for the management of biological invasions, as recognized by the Convention on Biological Diversity, its current strategic plan, and specifically Aichi Target 9 that concerns invasive alien species. Here we provide an overview of the process, approaches and the data needs for prioritization for invasion policy and management, with the intention of informing and guiding efforts to address this target. Many prioritization schemes quantify impact and risk, from the pragmatic and action-focused to the data-demanding and science-based. Effective prioritization must consider not only invasive species and pathways (as mentioned in Aichi Target 9), but also which sites are most sensitive and susceptible to invasion (not made explicit in Aichi Target 9). Integrated prioritization across these foci may lead to future efficiencies in resource allocation for invasion management. Many countries face the challenge of prioritizing with little capacity and poor baseline data. We recommend a consultative, science-based process for prioritizing impacts based on species, pathways and sites, and outline the information needed by countries to achieve this. This should be integrated into a national process that incorporates a broad suite of social and economic criteria. Such a process is likely to be feasible for most countries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-314
Number of pages16
JournalBiological Invasions
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this

McGeoch, M., Genovesi, P., Bellingham, P. J., Costello, M. J., McGrannachan, C. M., & Sheppard, A. (2016). Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion. Biological Invasions, 18(2), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-1013-1
McGeoch, Melodie ; Genovesi, Piero ; Bellingham, Peter J ; Costello, Mark John ; McGrannachan, Christopher Mark ; Sheppard, Andy. / Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion. In: Biological Invasions. 2016 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 299-314.
@article{1e2856b6c0a948648f68db96c0a53b85,
title = "Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion",
abstract = "Prioritization is indispensable for the management of biological invasions, as recognized by the Convention on Biological Diversity, its current strategic plan, and specifically Aichi Target 9 that concerns invasive alien species. Here we provide an overview of the process, approaches and the data needs for prioritization for invasion policy and management, with the intention of informing and guiding efforts to address this target. Many prioritization schemes quantify impact and risk, from the pragmatic and action-focused to the data-demanding and science-based. Effective prioritization must consider not only invasive species and pathways (as mentioned in Aichi Target 9), but also which sites are most sensitive and susceptible to invasion (not made explicit in Aichi Target 9). Integrated prioritization across these foci may lead to future efficiencies in resource allocation for invasion management. Many countries face the challenge of prioritizing with little capacity and poor baseline data. We recommend a consultative, science-based process for prioritizing impacts based on species, pathways and sites, and outline the information needed by countries to achieve this. This should be integrated into a national process that incorporates a broad suite of social and economic criteria. Such a process is likely to be feasible for most countries.",
author = "Melodie McGeoch and Piero Genovesi and Bellingham, {Peter J} and Costello, {Mark John} and McGrannachan, {Christopher Mark} and Andy Sheppard",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/s10530-015-1013-1",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "299--314",
journal = "Biological Invasions",
issn = "1387-3547",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

McGeoch, M, Genovesi, P, Bellingham, PJ, Costello, MJ, McGrannachan, CM & Sheppard, A 2016, 'Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion' Biological Invasions, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-1013-1

Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion. / McGeoch, Melodie; Genovesi, Piero; Bellingham, Peter J; Costello, Mark John; McGrannachan, Christopher Mark; Sheppard, Andy.

In: Biological Invasions, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2016, p. 299-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion

AU - McGeoch, Melodie

AU - Genovesi, Piero

AU - Bellingham, Peter J

AU - Costello, Mark John

AU - McGrannachan, Christopher Mark

AU - Sheppard, Andy

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Prioritization is indispensable for the management of biological invasions, as recognized by the Convention on Biological Diversity, its current strategic plan, and specifically Aichi Target 9 that concerns invasive alien species. Here we provide an overview of the process, approaches and the data needs for prioritization for invasion policy and management, with the intention of informing and guiding efforts to address this target. Many prioritization schemes quantify impact and risk, from the pragmatic and action-focused to the data-demanding and science-based. Effective prioritization must consider not only invasive species and pathways (as mentioned in Aichi Target 9), but also which sites are most sensitive and susceptible to invasion (not made explicit in Aichi Target 9). Integrated prioritization across these foci may lead to future efficiencies in resource allocation for invasion management. Many countries face the challenge of prioritizing with little capacity and poor baseline data. We recommend a consultative, science-based process for prioritizing impacts based on species, pathways and sites, and outline the information needed by countries to achieve this. This should be integrated into a national process that incorporates a broad suite of social and economic criteria. Such a process is likely to be feasible for most countries.

AB - Prioritization is indispensable for the management of biological invasions, as recognized by the Convention on Biological Diversity, its current strategic plan, and specifically Aichi Target 9 that concerns invasive alien species. Here we provide an overview of the process, approaches and the data needs for prioritization for invasion policy and management, with the intention of informing and guiding efforts to address this target. Many prioritization schemes quantify impact and risk, from the pragmatic and action-focused to the data-demanding and science-based. Effective prioritization must consider not only invasive species and pathways (as mentioned in Aichi Target 9), but also which sites are most sensitive and susceptible to invasion (not made explicit in Aichi Target 9). Integrated prioritization across these foci may lead to future efficiencies in resource allocation for invasion management. Many countries face the challenge of prioritizing with little capacity and poor baseline data. We recommend a consultative, science-based process for prioritizing impacts based on species, pathways and sites, and outline the information needed by countries to achieve this. This should be integrated into a national process that incorporates a broad suite of social and economic criteria. Such a process is likely to be feasible for most countries.

U2 - 10.1007/s10530-015-1013-1

DO - 10.1007/s10530-015-1013-1

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 299

EP - 314

JO - Biological Invasions

JF - Biological Invasions

SN - 1387-3547

IS - 2

ER -