Principles-based versus rules-based auditing standards: The effect of the transition from AS2 to AS5

Fang Yun Sin, Robyn Ann Moroney, Maria Strydom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The transition from a rules-based auditing standard (AS2) to a principles-based auditing standard (AS5) provides a context to assess how such a change impacts audit outcomes. Under a rules-based auditing standard, audit processes are relatively uniform, unscaleable and include significant redundancy. Under a principles-based auditing standard, audit effort can be directed to where risk is greatest; audits are scalable and can be customized. We find that the post-SOX shedding of risky clients by the Big 4 meant that non-Big 4 clients were more likely than Big 4 clients to disclose material internal control weaknesses (MICWs) when assured under AS2. This gap narrowed significantly following the transition to AS5, when risk-based customized audits were possible which benefited Big 4 firms to a greater extent than non-Big 4 firms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282 - 294
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Auditing
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

@article{a79c239b5cb3449aa4f5b4a44b613c6e,
title = "Principles-based versus rules-based auditing standards: The effect of the transition from AS2 to AS5",
abstract = "The transition from a rules-based auditing standard (AS2) to a principles-based auditing standard (AS5) provides a context to assess how such a change impacts audit outcomes. Under a rules-based auditing standard, audit processes are relatively uniform, unscaleable and include significant redundancy. Under a principles-based auditing standard, audit effort can be directed to where risk is greatest; audits are scalable and can be customized. We find that the post-SOX shedding of risky clients by the Big 4 meant that non-Big 4 clients were more likely than Big 4 clients to disclose material internal control weaknesses (MICWs) when assured under AS2. This gap narrowed significantly following the transition to AS5, when risk-based customized audits were possible which benefited Big 4 firms to a greater extent than non-Big 4 firms.",
author = "Sin, {Fang Yun} and Moroney, {Robyn Ann} and Maria Strydom",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/ijau.12045",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "282 -- 294",
journal = "International Journal of Auditing",
issn = "1090-6738",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Principles-based versus rules-based auditing standards: The effect of the transition from AS2 to AS5. / Sin, Fang Yun; Moroney, Robyn Ann; Strydom, Maria.

In: International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2015, p. 282 - 294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Principles-based versus rules-based auditing standards: The effect of the transition from AS2 to AS5

AU - Sin, Fang Yun

AU - Moroney, Robyn Ann

AU - Strydom, Maria

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The transition from a rules-based auditing standard (AS2) to a principles-based auditing standard (AS5) provides a context to assess how such a change impacts audit outcomes. Under a rules-based auditing standard, audit processes are relatively uniform, unscaleable and include significant redundancy. Under a principles-based auditing standard, audit effort can be directed to where risk is greatest; audits are scalable and can be customized. We find that the post-SOX shedding of risky clients by the Big 4 meant that non-Big 4 clients were more likely than Big 4 clients to disclose material internal control weaknesses (MICWs) when assured under AS2. This gap narrowed significantly following the transition to AS5, when risk-based customized audits were possible which benefited Big 4 firms to a greater extent than non-Big 4 firms.

AB - The transition from a rules-based auditing standard (AS2) to a principles-based auditing standard (AS5) provides a context to assess how such a change impacts audit outcomes. Under a rules-based auditing standard, audit processes are relatively uniform, unscaleable and include significant redundancy. Under a principles-based auditing standard, audit effort can be directed to where risk is greatest; audits are scalable and can be customized. We find that the post-SOX shedding of risky clients by the Big 4 meant that non-Big 4 clients were more likely than Big 4 clients to disclose material internal control weaknesses (MICWs) when assured under AS2. This gap narrowed significantly following the transition to AS5, when risk-based customized audits were possible which benefited Big 4 firms to a greater extent than non-Big 4 firms.

U2 - 10.1111/ijau.12045

DO - 10.1111/ijau.12045

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 282

EP - 294

JO - International Journal of Auditing

JF - International Journal of Auditing

SN - 1090-6738

IS - 3

ER -