Abstract
Chemotherapy has been the mainstay of therapy for acute
myeloid leukaemia (AML) for over five decades. Despite
doses of cytarabine and anthracyclines approaching the
limits of haematopoietic tolerance, half of all patients
eventually relapse [1]. The situation is far worse for
elderly patients, who are largely palliated because of the
unfavourable risk-benefit ratio associated with intensive
chemotherapy in older populations. Therapies tailored
to specific sub-groups of AML have been remarkably
effective, such as all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic for
acute promyelocytic leukaemia, which have emerged as
frontline therapies for this disease [2]. Other attempts
to ?target? AML, such as with FLT3 inhibitors have been
less successful, especially in the setting of chemotherapy
failure [3]. Gaining insights into the molecular basis of
treatment failure will be a key objective for improving
therapeutic outcomes of this aggressive blood cancer. For
certain targeted therapies, such as FLT3 inhibitors, clinical
resistance has been linked to emergence of ?on-target?
drug resistant mutations, which may be an important
hurdle to the successful development of this drug class
[4,5]. The biological basis for treatment failure with nontargeted
therapies, such as chemotherapy, has been far
more complex to decipher.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1 - 4 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | BioDiscovery |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver