TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary care outcomes questionnaire
T2 - psychometric testing of a new instrument
AU - Murphy, Mairead
AU - Hollinghurst, Sandra
AU - Cowlishaw, Sean
AU - Salisbury, Chris
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank all the participants in this study, in particular the patients who completed the questionnaires and the primary care centres that allowed it to be administered. The authors also thank the Bristol Primary Care Research Network for assisting with recruiting the participants, and the NIHR SPCR for funding the research.
Funding Information:
This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research (NIHR SPCR), which is a partnership between the universities of Bristol, Cambridge, Keele, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham, Oxford, Southampton, and University College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health. Mairead Murphy was partly funded by the Avon Primary Care Research Collaborative.
Publisher Copyright:
© British Journal of General Practice.
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Background Patients attend primary care for many reasons and to achieve a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) designed to capture these diverse outcomes, and trials of interventions in primary care may thus fail to detect beneficial effects. Aim This study describes the psychometric testing of the Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ), which was designed to capture a broad range of outcomes relevant to primary care. Design and setting Questionnaires were administered in primary care in South West England. Method Patients completed the PCOQ in GP waiting rooms before a consultation, and a second questionnaire, including the PCOQ and seven comparator PROMs, after 1 week. Psychometric testing included exploratory factor analysis on the PCOQ, internal consistency, correlation coefficients between domain scores and comparator measures, and repeated measures effect sizes indicating change across 1 week. Results In total, 602 patients completed the PCOQ at baseline, and 264 (44%) returned the followup questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis suggested four dimensions underlying the PCOQ items: health and wellbeing, health knowledge and self-care, confidence in health provision, and confidence in health plan. Each dimension was internally consistent and correlated as expected with comparator PROMs, providing evidence of construct validity. Patients reporting an improvement in their main problem exhibited small to moderate improvements in relevant domain scores on the PCOQ. Conclusion The PCOQ was acceptable, feasible, showed strong psychometric properties, and was responsive to change. It is a promising new tool for assessment of outcomes of primary care interventions from a patient perspective.
AB - Background Patients attend primary care for many reasons and to achieve a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) designed to capture these diverse outcomes, and trials of interventions in primary care may thus fail to detect beneficial effects. Aim This study describes the psychometric testing of the Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ), which was designed to capture a broad range of outcomes relevant to primary care. Design and setting Questionnaires were administered in primary care in South West England. Method Patients completed the PCOQ in GP waiting rooms before a consultation, and a second questionnaire, including the PCOQ and seven comparator PROMs, after 1 week. Psychometric testing included exploratory factor analysis on the PCOQ, internal consistency, correlation coefficients between domain scores and comparator measures, and repeated measures effect sizes indicating change across 1 week. Results In total, 602 patients completed the PCOQ at baseline, and 264 (44%) returned the followup questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis suggested four dimensions underlying the PCOQ items: health and wellbeing, health knowledge and self-care, confidence in health provision, and confidence in health plan. Each dimension was internally consistent and correlated as expected with comparator PROMs, providing evidence of construct validity. Patients reporting an improvement in their main problem exhibited small to moderate improvements in relevant domain scores on the PCOQ. Conclusion The PCOQ was acceptable, feasible, showed strong psychometric properties, and was responsive to change. It is a promising new tool for assessment of outcomes of primary care interventions from a patient perspective.
KW - Health services research
KW - Patient-centred care
KW - Patient-reported outcomes
KW - Primary care
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Quality of care
KW - Questionnaires
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048235842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3399/bjgp18X695765
DO - 10.3399/bjgp18X695765
M3 - Article
C2 - 29581130
AN - SCOPUS:85048235842
SN - 0960-1643
VL - 68
SP - e433-e440
JO - British Journal of General Practice
JF - British Journal of General Practice
IS - 671
ER -