TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence and utility of point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department
T2 - A prospective observational study
AU - Pouryahya, Pourya
AU - Meyer, Alastair D. McR
AU - Koo, Melody
N1 - Funding Information:
Special thanks to all Monash Health Emergency team and Monash Emergency ultrasound group in particular, the research assistants (all medical students rotating through Monash Health EDs during the study period), Dr. Gabriel Bletcher, Dr. Igor Tulchinsky, Dr. Melody Hiew, Dr. Lauren Dabarera, Dr. Neil Goldie, Dr. Rachel Rosler, Mr. Anthony Wlad and Mrs. Carolynne Cormack for their support during this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Objective: An observational study on the current diagnostic and procedural utility, as well as impact of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the emergency department (ED). Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been recognised as a useful non-invasive bedside tool in providing valuable information, as well as its utility in procedural guidance for clinicians. However, its current prevalence and utility in ED remain unknown. Methods: In October 2016, a 31-day prospective observational study was performed in three Monash Health Emergency Departments in Melbourne, Australia. Data regarding patients’ presenting complaints, frequency, operators’ qualifications and POCUS module were collected and analysed. Factors associated with diagnostic impacts were identified. Results: A total of 390 (2.1%) POCUS examinations were performed among 18,355 presentations in the three Monash Health EDs during the study period. POCUS was performed as a diagnostic tool in 344 (88.2%) and procedural guidance in 46 (11.8%) cases. eFAST/AAA and bedside echocardiography were the two most frequently utilised diagnostic modules. Overall, the majority of diagnostic POCUS cases were indicated for abdominal pain (35.3%), chest pain (14.0%) and trauma mainly traffic accidents (5.8%). Procedural POCUS was most commonly used for vascular access (71.7%), where dyspnoea (21.6%) was the most common presenting complaint. The majority of the cases were performed by FACEMs (Fellows of Australasian College of Emergency Medicine) (66.4%). Conclusions: Despite known diagnostic and procedural values, the prevalence of POCUS in ED was found to be lower than what was expected. The prevalence was shown to be proportional to the level of clinical expertise among the operators. Training and utility of POCUS among physicians and trainees should be further advocated and supported.
AB - Objective: An observational study on the current diagnostic and procedural utility, as well as impact of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the emergency department (ED). Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been recognised as a useful non-invasive bedside tool in providing valuable information, as well as its utility in procedural guidance for clinicians. However, its current prevalence and utility in ED remain unknown. Methods: In October 2016, a 31-day prospective observational study was performed in three Monash Health Emergency Departments in Melbourne, Australia. Data regarding patients’ presenting complaints, frequency, operators’ qualifications and POCUS module were collected and analysed. Factors associated with diagnostic impacts were identified. Results: A total of 390 (2.1%) POCUS examinations were performed among 18,355 presentations in the three Monash Health EDs during the study period. POCUS was performed as a diagnostic tool in 344 (88.2%) and procedural guidance in 46 (11.8%) cases. eFAST/AAA and bedside echocardiography were the two most frequently utilised diagnostic modules. Overall, the majority of diagnostic POCUS cases were indicated for abdominal pain (35.3%), chest pain (14.0%) and trauma mainly traffic accidents (5.8%). Procedural POCUS was most commonly used for vascular access (71.7%), where dyspnoea (21.6%) was the most common presenting complaint. The majority of the cases were performed by FACEMs (Fellows of Australasian College of Emergency Medicine) (66.4%). Conclusions: Despite known diagnostic and procedural values, the prevalence of POCUS in ED was found to be lower than what was expected. The prevalence was shown to be proportional to the level of clinical expertise among the operators. Training and utility of POCUS among physicians and trainees should be further advocated and supported.
KW - emergency
KW - emergency medicine
KW - point-of-care ultrasound
KW - ultrasound
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85100771868
U2 - 10.1002/ajum.12172
DO - 10.1002/ajum.12172
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100771868
SN - 1836-6864
VL - 22
SP - 273
EP - 278
JO - Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
JF - Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
IS - 4
ER -