Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Preserving the craft: reflections on teaching an interpretive methods spring school

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

Since 2017 we have taught a spring school on interpretive political science via the National Centre for Research Methods at the University of Southampton. In this chapter, we reflect on the challenges and rewards. We think the event has four values. First, it is a 'safe space' that reassures uncertain or conflicted newcomers of the legitimacy of this craft. Second, it offers catharsis, allowing participants to express fears and doubts about pursuing a research career. Third, it helps participants to begin building a network of like-minded but equally isolated colleagues across disparate institutions and countries. Last, it helps pass on experiential knowledge, not just tools. Its key value, in other words, lies in its capacity to support the interpretive study of politics and policy (see Schwartz-Shea 2021; Wagenaar and Bartels forthcoming). At heart, we believe that structured training opportunities are a key means of preserving this important craft.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHow to Conduct Interpretive Research
Subtitle of host publicationInsights for Students and Researchers
EditorsColette Einfeld, Helen Sullivan
Place of PublicationCheltenham UK
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter8
Pages123-133
Number of pages11
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781035313990, 9781035370016
ISBN (Print)9781035313983
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Craft
  • Experiential learning
  • Interpretive political science
  • Network
  • Training

Cite this